DSV & Anor v DSU
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Vinodh Coomaraswamy |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Oon & Bazul LLP, Cavinder Bull, Chan Jin Yi Wesley, Fu Journe Hahn, Prakaash s/o Paniar Silvam, Tan Jui Yang Benedict, Yap Wei Xuan Mendel |
Source: [2026] SGHC 128, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
DSV and another v DSU [2026] SGHC 128 is a General Division of the High Court decision delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy J on 15 June 2026 in Originating Application No 1153 of 2025. The claimants, anonymised as DSV and DSW pursuant to section 23(4) of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) and Order 48 Rule 2(1) of the Rules of Court 2021, applied to set aside a partial final award dated 14 July 2025 issued in a Singapore-seated arbitration against the respondent, anonymised as DSU. The judgment addresses grounds including breach of natural justice and non-compliance with the parties' agreed arbitral procedure, and cites 18 Singapore authorities.
[2026] SGHC 128 explained
DSV & Anor v DSU ([2026] SGHC 128) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 15 June 2026. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 128 about?
DSV & Anor v DSU ([2026] SGHC 128) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration - Award - Recourse against award - Setting aside - Breach of natural justice”, “Arbitration - Arbitral procedure - Whether arbitral procedure was in accordance with the parties' agreement”, and “Arbitration - Award - Recourse against award - Setting aside - Grounds raised in the supporting affidavit but not advanced in submission”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 128 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), Evidence Act (Cap 97), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Why were the parties in the DSU arbitration award setting-aside case anonymised ([2026] SGHC 128)?
In DSV and another v DSU [2026] SGHC 128, the parties were anonymised under section 23(4) of the International Arbitration Act 1994 and Order 48 Rule 2(1) of the Rules of Court 2021, to protect the confidentiality of the underlying Singapore-seated arbitration.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (18)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 128)