Insurance

5 cases · January 2025 to March 2026

Overview

Insurance appeared in 3 reported judgments in Singapore between January 2025 to February 2026. Key sub-topics included Motor vehicle insurance — Recovery of unsatisfied judgment from Motor Insurers’ Bureau (“MIB”) (1) and Motor vehicle insurance — Section 9(1) Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act 1960 (1). The most active judge was Kwek Mean Luck (1 case), and the leading firm was Titanium Law Chambers LLC (1 case).

Data coverage: between January 2025 to February 2026

Which law firms handle the most Insurance cases in Singapore?

Titanium Law Chambers LLC leads in insurance with 1 case between January 2025 to February 2026, followed by East Asia Law Corporation (1 case) and Central Chambers Law Corporation (1 case). 8 firms appeared in insurance cases during this period.

Who are the leading Insurance lawyers in Singapore?

Choo Ian Ming is the most active insurance lawyer in Singapore with 1 case appearance between January 2025 to February 2026, followed by Manickam Kasturibai (1) and Sandosham Paul Rabindranath (1). 27 lawyers appeared in insurance cases during this period.

Which judges handle the most Insurance cases in Singapore?

Kwek Mean Luck has handled 1 case in insurance between January 2025 to February 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Sir Henry Bernard Eder (1 case) and Chua Lee Ming (1 case) are also among the most active. 3 judges heard insurance cases.

How many insurance cases are heard in Singapore courts?

Between January 2025 to February 2026, 3 reported judgments involved insurance in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (6 cases).

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore insurance cases?

The main sub-topics in Singapore insurance litigation between January 2025 to February 2026 were Motor vehicle insurance — Recovery of unsatisfied judgment from Motor Insurers’ Bureau (“MIB”) (1 case), Motor vehicle insurance — Section 9(1) Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act 1960 (1 case), General principles — Condition precedent — Non-disclosure — Risk (1 case), Marine insurance — Duty of fair presentation — Sections 3, 7 UK Insurance Act 2015 (1 case).

Case Volume by Year

2
25
3
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Motor vehicle insurance — Recovery of unsatisfied judgment from Motor Insurers’ Bureau (“MIB”) 1 case

Motor vehicle insurance — Section 9(1) Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act 1960 1 case

Marine insurance — Duty of fair presentation — Sections 3, 7 UK Insurance Act 2015 1 case

Marine insurance — Breach of warranties — Sections 10, 11 UK Insurance Act 2015 1 case

Marine insurance — Whether vessel was a constructive total loss — Clause 6.1.1 Institute Time Clauses (Hulls) 1.10.83 CL 280 1 case

Marine insurance — Whether loss caused by perils of the seas — Whether vessel was a decrepitude or debility — Clause 6.1.1 Institute Time Clauses (Hulls) 1.10.83 CL 280 1 case

General principles — Condition precedent — Non-disclosure — Risk 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 3 cases
Insurance Act (Cap 142)
cited in 2 cases
MPA Act
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases