The most-cited Intellectual Property cases in this corpus
4 data points · Singapore case-law corpus
Among Singapore Intellectual Property judgments in this corpus, Ka Shin Technologies (s) Pte Ltd v Tan Kiat Lian & 2 Ors ([2025] SGHC 160) is the most-cited decision, referred to by 1 other Singapore judgments here. The 4 most-cited Intellectual Property cases are listed below.
Key findings
Every figure below is computed from the Singapore case-law corpus and links to its source. See the methodology for how the numbers were derived.
More on this analysis
How is a case classified as Intellectual Property?
Cases are grouped by their catchwords — the editorial topic tags published with each Singapore judgment. A judgment is included here when one of its top-level catchword categories normalises to Intellectual Property.
Methodology
This ranking is restricted to judgments categorised under Intellectual Property by their catchwords. Each case is ranked by its in-corpus citation count — the number of other Singapore judgments in this corpus (845 decisions) that cite it. The count is derived from the citation graph by resolving each citation to the judgment it refers to; only citations that resolve to another decision held in this corpus are counted. Citations to foreign judgments, and citations whose target is not in this corpus, are excluded, so the figures are a conservative lower bound on how often each case has actually been cited. Of 10,176 citations recorded across the corpus, 316 resolve to an in-corpus decision and are counted here. Figures were last computed on 2026-06-14 and update as the corpus grows.
Compiled by the SG Case Law editorial team from primary sources — the judgments themselves and Singapore Statutes Online (sso.agc.gov.sg). · Updated 14 June 2026 · How we compile this