Abuse of Process
11 cases · March 2025 to February 2026
Which law firms handle the most Abuse of Process cases in Singapore?
Allen & Gledhill LLP leads in Abuse of Process with 2 cases between March 2025 to February 2026, followed by Attorney-General's Chambers (2 cases) and Eugene Thurasingam LLP (1 cases). 21 firms appeared in Abuse of Process cases during this period.
1. Allen & Gledhill LLP 2 cases 2. Attorney-General's Chambers 2 cases 3. Eugene Thurasingam LLP 1 case 4. Virtus Law LLP 1 case 5. Meritus Law LLC 1 case 6. Ascendant Legal LLC 1 case 7. Withers KhattarWong LLP 1 case 8. Ashvin Law Corporation 1 case 9. Luo Ling Ling LLC 1 case 10. Fullerton Law Chambers LLC 1 case 11. WongPartnership LLP 1 case 12. Breakpoint LLC 1 case 13. Chua & Partners LLP 1 case 14. Ravindran Associates LLP 1 case 15. Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP 1 case
Who are the leading Abuse of Process lawyers in Singapore?
Sruthi Boppana is the most active Abuse of Process lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between March 2025 to February 2026, followed by Sophia Ng (1) and Tan Kai Liang (1).
1. Sruthi Boppana 2 cases 2. Sophia Ng 1 case 3. Tan Kai Liang 1 case 4. Afzal Ali 1 case 5. Lauren Tang Hui Jing 1 case 6. Ooi Chit Yee 1 case 7. Joshua Foo 1 case 8. Matthew Soo 1 case 9. Hewage Ushan Saminda Premaratne 1 case 10. Tan Liqi Joseph 1 case 11. Chew Kei-Jin 1 case 12. Eunice Chan Swee En 1 case 13. Lee Chia Ming 1 case 14. Lam Yan-Ting Tyne 1 case 15. Chenthil Kumar Kumarasingam 1 case
Which judges handle the most Abuse of Process cases in Singapore?
Belinda Ang Saw Ean has handled 3 Abuse of Process cases between March 2025 to February 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Tan Siong Thye (2 cases) and Steven Chong (2 cases) are also among the most active.
Case Volume by Year
9 25
2 26
2025–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Henderson v Henderson doctrine 5 Collateral purpose 3 Riddick principle 2 Riddick principle — Cogency of the evidence 1 Inconsistent positions 1
Henderson v Henderson doctrine 5 cases
Collateral purpose 3 cases
Riddick principle 2 cases
Riddick principle — Cogency of the evidence 1 case
Inconsistent positions 1 case
Key Statutes
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68)
cited in 3 cases Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322)
cited in 2 cases International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A)
cited in 2 cases Business Names Registration Act
cited in 1 case Partnership Act
cited in 1 case Companies Act (Cap 50)
cited in 1 case Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 1 case Evidence Act (Cap 97)
cited in 1 case Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185)
cited in 1 case Malaysian Courts of Judicature Act
cited in 1 case UK Act
cited in 1 case Arbitration Act (Cap 10)
cited in 1 case Legal Profession Act (Cap 161)
cited in 1 case Securities and Futures Act (Cap 289)
cited in 1 case Employment Act (Cap 91)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Cases
[2026] SGHCR 4
Djony Gunawan v Christina Lesmana
23 February 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 16
FORBES MONACO APAC v KAWAJIRI SEIJI
21 January 2026
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 194
LLS CAPITAL PTE LTD v Chan Swee Lean & Anor
30 September 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 153
COMPANIA DE NAVEGACION PALOMAR, S.A. & 5 Ors v ERNEST FERDINAND PEREZ DE LA SALA
7 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 20
GOH HUI EN REBECCA v IG ASIA PTE. LTD.
1 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHCR 14
SPACKMAN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LIMITED v WOO SANG CHEOL
23 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 18
CEO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
25 April 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC(I) 12
DMF v DMG
17 April 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHCR 2
L’OREAL & Anor v SHOPEE SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED
2 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 10
CIX v DGN
13 March 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGCA 9
Masri Bin Hussain v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
7 March 2025
SGCA