Allen & Gledhill LLP
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Allen & Gledhill LLP. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.
Allen & Gledhill LLP appears in 170 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Insolvency Law and Contract, and Allen & Gledhill LLP acted for the defendant in 38 and the respondent in 35.
- Reported cases
- 170
- Courts
- High Court, Singapore International Commercial Court, High Court (Appellate Division), Court of Appeal, High Court Registrar, High Court (Family Division), Court of Appeal (International), District Court
- Period
- January 2023 to October 2026
Source: derived from 170 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Allen & Gledhill LLP — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Allen & Gledhill LLP appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 38 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 35 cases
- Counsel for the third party
- 23 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 19 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 14 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 14 cases
- Counsel for the claimant
- 6 cases
- Counsel for the non-party
- 5 cases
- Counsel for the Law Society of Singapore
- 4 cases
- Young independent counsel
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the Berkshire Hathaway Speciality Insurance
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the defendants
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiffs
- 1 case
- Counsel for the fourth defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the creditor
- 1 case
- Young independent counsel
- 1 case
- Counsel for the claimant and defendant in counterclaim
- 1 case
- Independent counsel
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 18
- Application dismissed
- 8
- Appeal allowed in part
- 7
- Appeal allowed
- 4
- Application granted
- 3
- Application allowed
- 3
Outcome recorded for 43 of the 170 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“For the above reasons, we dismiss MA 9192.”
High Court · 14 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 213 · Counsel for the third party · Appeal dismissed -
“For the foregoing reasons, we allow the appeal in respect of Tuffi’s claim against Techkon, and dismiss the appeal in respect of Tuffi’s claim against TDSPL.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 8 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 25 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed in part -
“…we dismiss the appeals by ES in their entirety.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed -
“Zhuang was granted leave to commence proceedings in the name and on behalf of the Companies against Huang in respect of his alleged “breaches of fiduciary and other duties owed by Huang to the [Companies] arising out of or in connection with Huang’s position as a director, [CEO] and/or employee” of the Companies.”
High Court · 15 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 127 · Counsel for the applicant · Application granted -
“…we allowed the appeal, set aside the winding-up order made by the Judge, and dismissed CWU 120.”
Court of Appeal · 8 May 2026 · [2026] SGCA 24 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed -
“…we dismissed the appeal.”
Court of Appeal · 17 April 2026 · [2026] SGCA 19 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
What areas of law does Allen & Gledhill LLP specialize in?
Civil Procedure 50 cases
Reported between March 2023 and September 2026.
Insolvency Law 29 cases
Reported between February 2023 and August 2026.
Contract 22 cases
Reported between March 2023 and October 2026.
Counsel named in these judgments (197)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Allen & Gledhill LLP in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (170)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the 12-month disqualification, holding that the retest requirement is not a relevant sentencing consideration.
High Court · 14 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 213 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part: it allowed Tuffi's claim against Techkon, rectifying the 2019 agreement so that the adjusted final sum was $1,452,962.89 and ordering Techkon to pay…
High Court (Appellate Division) · 8 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 25 -
The court allowed Poten's claims in part, finding Mr Lee liable on all three claims but for far less than claimed: S$32,384.62 as payment in lieu of notice, S$32,384.62 under s 16 of the Employment…
High Court · 7 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 208 -
The court allowed the application and granted OA 16 in its entirety, sanctioning the scheme of arrangement.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 24 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 22 -
The High Court allowed the summary determination application in part.
High Court · 18 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 190 -
The SICC allowed SH BVI's oppression claim in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 20 -
The High Court allowed the three summonses in part, ordering each bank within 28 days to list and produce defined categories of documents set out in an annex, and dismissed the brother's registrar's…
High Court · 10 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 184 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeals in their entirety, leaving the striking out and the judge's costs orders undisturbed.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23 -
The Assistant Registrar held that the striking out application was premature but declined to dismiss it.
High Court Registrar · 25 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 37 -
The court declined to order that Meritus be substituted for DJM, granted DJM permission to withdraw the bankruptcy application, and ordered Mr Tan to pay DJM costs fixed at $3,500 (all in).
High Court Registrar · 17 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 34 -
The court made the bankruptcy orders and ordered that the A&M Nominees be appointed as joint and several private trustees of both debtors' bankruptcy estates.
High Court Registrar · 14 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 33 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed STEAS's application, struck out the third party statement of claim and USS's third party notice, and dismissed the third party proceedings.
High Court Registrar · 5 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 32 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed both IPCG's application and DB's application in part.
High Court Registrar · 20 July 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 26 -
The court granted the application and sanctioned the scheme as voted on by the scheme creditors at the scheme meeting, without either of the alterations MAI sought.
High Court · 17 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 150 -
Kristy Tan J allowed RA 100 in part.
High Court · 16 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 149 -
The High Court dismissed AQCEL's application in CWU 23 and allowed LHG's application in CWU 60, ordering that LIH be wound up on just and equitable grounds and appointing LHG's liquidators as joint…
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 138 -
The Appellate Division dismissed FSH's appeal and allowed SGI's appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 29 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 19 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 17 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 18 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part and dismissed D1's counterclaim.
High Court · 16 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 129 -
The High Court allowed OA 183 on 4 March 2026, granting Zhuang permission to bring proceedings in the companies' names against Huang for breaches of fiduciary and other duties and giving him full…
High Court · 15 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 127 -
The Assistant Registrar dismissed the defendants' application in SUM 1656.
High Court Registrar · 12 June 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 19 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals against conviction and sentence.
Court of Appeal · 19 May 2026 · [2026] SGCA 23 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the winding-up order and dismissed CWU 120.
Court of Appeal · 8 May 2026 · [2026] SGCA 24 -
Aidan Xu J allowed the amended prayers in part, by way of a fresh oral application rather than an amendment of SUM 3300.
High Court · 30 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 91 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no arguable case of reasonable suspicion that the Board breached a duty to give reasons.
Court of Appeal · 17 April 2026 · [2026] SGCA 19 -
Chua Lee Ming J allowed all three appeals, set aside the Assistant Registrar's orders and struck out Ever Strategy's claims against all the defendants.
High Court · 9 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 76 -
The High Court (Andre Maniam J) dismissed Summons No 3515 of 2025, declining to determine either the defendants' question or Babbobox's alternative question summarily.
High Court · 8 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 66 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part.
Court of Appeal · 4 March 2026 · [2026] SGCA 9 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the application without an oral hearing.
Court of Appeal · 3 March 2026 · [2026] SGCA 7 -
The court held that any exclusionary period should generally run from the date of the court order, not from the end of the practice training period.
High Court · 3 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 46 -
The court refused the application, making no orders on any of the three prayers in HC/SUM 3300/2025.
High Court · 4 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 27 -
The court, in an ex tempore judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, granted the application and ordered that the respondent be struck off the Roll.
High Court · 22 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 22 -
The court set aside the freezing order ORC 5600 and allowed SUM 2992, the defendant's setting-aside application.
High Court · 21 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 16 -
The District Court allowed the claim in part: Ms Tan succeeded on the petition, the Google Document, the AGM agenda item and the AGM speech, and failed on the two special resolution forms.
District Court · 19 January 2026 · [2026] SGDC 1 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed Valency's appeal in CA 31 and allowed Oldendorff's appeal in CA 32, holding that neither release instruction was an act of conversion and that Valency in any event…
Court of Appeal · 12 January 2026 · [2026] SGCA 1 -
The High Court dismissed the moratorium application.
High Court · 23 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 259 -
The court allowed the application and granted the four-month moratorium in the terms sought, with added directions: monthly email updates to all creditors on the status of negotiations with Hildrics,…
High Court · 10 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 251 -
The High Court dismissed both applications, holding that the Amended Notes were new notes rather than an amendment of the original notes, and directed the parties to file submissions on costs within…
High Court · 3 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 239 -
The court refused to order the separate questions proposed by the claimant.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 12 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 26 -
The High Court allowed the trustees' application in OA 672, declaring that Mr Mishra did not have the leave of court needed to commence the arbitration and restraining him from pursuing it against…
High Court · 4 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 218 -
The court dismissed Mr Kwon's application and Covenson's counterclaim for reinstatement costs, and allowed Covenson's counterclaim for additional rent of $40,000.
High Court · 30 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 212 -
The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' further claims in part.
High Court · 16 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 204 -
The High Court dismissed Tuffi's claims entirely and said it would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 14 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 201 -
The High Court dismissed both appeals on 6 August 2025, refused a stay of enforcement of the summary judgment pending GEA's counterclaim, and awarded Ripple costs fixed at $20,000 inclusive of…
High Court · 30 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 193 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 25 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC(A) 20 -
Tan Siong Thye SJ found Mr Lo liable for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misstatement and conspiracy by unlawful means, and allowed the claim.
High Court · 19 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 188 -
The court dismissed the Prosecution's appeal and left the $150,000 fine undisturbed.
High Court · 10 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 179 -
The Court of Appeal (Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment, with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Ang Cheng Hock J) dismissed both appeals, upholding Maersk's liability for breach of the contracts of…
Court of Appeal · 5 September 2025 · [2025] SGCA 42 -
The court allowed both applications: it ordered the stay on OS 1193 lifted, joined JPM as the third respondent, and allowed consequential amendments limiting the relief to the return of the shares.
High Court Registrar · 27 August 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 29 -
The court found both parties in breach and allowed each side's claims in part.
High Court · 22 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 168 -
The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the striking out of the claims against Mr Ong and the refusal of the amendment and of the joinder of Java Asset, since the revised statement of claim…
High Court · 21 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 166 -
The court allowed DB's claims against ARJ and Mr Juma as prayed for at Prayers 1 to 3 of the statement of claim, and dismissed the counterclaim.
High Court · 15 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 163 -
The court ordered no stay or adjournment for Mr Ariffin, finding him fit and proper, and directed that his application be set down for hearing.
High Court · 8 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 156 -
The court dismissed the application for anonymisation, directed that the earlier grounds of decision cease to be redacted and be re-published naming the applicant, and ordered the parties to bear…
High Court · 7 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 155 -
The court dismissed the application for admission, ordered a minimum exclusionary period of five years before any fresh application, and made no order as to costs.
High Court · 7 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 72 -
The International Judge made no order as to costs of the stay application or of SUM 25 and SUM 51.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 4 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 21 -
The High Court dismissed the owner's counterclaim in its entirety.
High Court · 28 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC 142 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.
Court of Appeal · 21 July 2025 · [2025] SGCA 35 -
The court allowed TFL's application in part, declaring that SUM 19 was commenced in breach of ORC 13, striking it out and dismissing it as against TFL, and ordering that no one may take a step to…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 11 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 18 -
The court dismissed OA 449 and refused leave to convene the creditors' meeting.
High Court · 1 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC 120 -
The High Court dismissed the applications to adduce fresh evidence and dismissed both registrar's appeals, leaving the refusal of the extension in place.
High Court · 27 June 2025 · [2025] SGHC 115 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence, upholding both convictions, subject to a finding that the touching on the Mat Charge was over rather than under the complainant's…
High Court · 28 May 2025 · [2025] SGHC 102 -
The High Court allowed PHGM's application in part and reduced AH-REIT's proof of debt by excluding property tax from 1 October 2022 to 27 June 2023 totalling $273,792 and the costs of items four,…
High Court · 23 May 2025 · [2025] SGHC 97 -
The court varied its order of 19 February 2025 so that DKC had to commence the Stockholm arbitration by 12 April 2025, a shorter extension than DKC sought.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 2 May 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 14 -
The court refused the second defendant's request to vary the costs order and ordered the second defendant to pay the first defendant's costs of the summons assessed at $35,000, less than the $40,000…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 22 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 13 -
The court dismissed both OA 26 and OA 27, holding DMF a party to the charterparty and bound by the arbitration clause, and leaving illegality and public policy to the tribunal.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 12 -
The court allowed DKC's application and ordered that all further proceedings be stayed under s 6 of the Act, on condition that DKC commence a Stockholm expedited arbitration within 10 days seeking…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 16 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 11 -
The court dismissed Mr Lorinet's claims.
High Court · 10 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC 66 -
The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…
High Court · 28 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 50 -
The court ordered W Power to pay Mingyang's costs of $21,000 for the pre-transfer period and $177,401.97 for the post-transfer period, comprising $121,910 for SUM 15, $45,212.17 for the balance of…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 11 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 7 -
The court refused the adjournment and granted all the relief sought: it recognised the plan and the confirmation order, allowed TFL to administer and realise its Singapore assets and take steps to…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 21 February 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 4 -
The court allowed FXA's application in part and directed the liquidators to admit the proof of debt partially: $110,701.54 for rent, service charge and the administrative fee from December 2023 to 7…
High Court · 12 February 2025 · [2025] SGHC 23 -
The Court of Appeal (Robert French IJ delivering the judgment, with Judith Prakash SJ and Bernard Rix IJ) dismissed Senda's appeal and allowed Kiri's appeal in part, granting a lower rate and later…
Court of Appeal (International) · 31 January 2025 · [2025] SGCA(I) 1 -
The High Court (Family Division) dismissed the husband's appeal, upholding the finding that the Singapore courts had jurisdiction to hear the divorce, with costs submissions to be filed within 14…
High Court (Family Division) · 22 January 2025 · [2025] SGHCF 5 -
The High Court granted Olam's application and ordered the Singapore enforcement proceedings adjourned pending the final determination of the Malaysian setting aside application, holding the rest of…
High Court · 13 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 5 -
The court allowed the application in part.
High Court · 13 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 6 -
Philip Jeyaretnam J granted the bankruptcy orders and appointed the two BDO nominees, Mr Leow Quek Shiong and Ms Seah Roh Lin, as the claimants' private trustees in bankruptcy, rejecting a joint…
High Court · 30 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 328 -
The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction and ordered that USD41,900 be returned to Ms Wise in that currency and that the remaining USD611.55 vest in the Government.
High Court · 12 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 320 -
The High Court allowed the appeal.
High Court · 6 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 314 -
Hri Kumar Nair J dismissed both appeals at the end of the hearing, leaving the striking out of Kapital's claim against Andrew and Stephanie in place.
High Court · 7 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 289 -
The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Steven Chong JCA) allowed the appeal.
Court of Appeal · 6 November 2024 · [2024] SGCA 48 -
Sundaresh Menon CJ granted leave to withdraw the admission application and imposed a minimum exclusionary period of two years from 15 August 2024, rather than the four years sought, together with the…
High Court · 28 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 274 -
The International Judge dismissed DKB's application in SUM 46 for English counsel to make submissions on English law, with costs to DKC.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 25 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 31 -
The court dismissed both applications.
High Court · 25 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 271 -
The High Court declined to stay the application, heard it on its merits and dismissed it, upholding the rejection of the proof of debt.
High Court · 17 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 263 -
Thomas Bathurst IJ granted Ming Yang's application.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 15 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 29 -
The High Court allowed the liquidators' sanction application and sanctioned the scheme, and dismissed the remaining prayers in UTSS's application to set aside the convening order.
High Court · 15 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 256 -
The Assistant Registrar dismissed Ms Choudary's application for security for costs.
High Court Registrar · 11 October 2024 · [2024] SGHCR 11 -
Mohamed Faizal JC dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the proposal was neither serious nor viable and was merely seeking to delay the inevitable.
High Court · 10 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 232 -
The court allowed the application and granted an order under s 175(1) of the Evidence Act 1893 permitting the applicant to inspect and take copies of the respondent's DBS bank statements.
High Court · 4 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 227 -
The court ordered Senda to pay 40% of Kiri's costs and disbursements, and Kiri to pay 50% of DyStar's costs and disbursements.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 29 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 25 -
The court allowed the Attorney-General's application and ordered that Ms Phua be struck off the roll, with a minimum reinstatement interval of two years and six months, subject to the usual…
High Court · 20 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 214 -
The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' claims and dismissed Mr Grover's counterclaim.
High Court · 13 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 206 -
Hri Kumar Nair J granted the application, ruling that the trustee had the right to recoup the overpayments for the period from 21 November 2001 to 1 May 2014 and sanctioning the proposed plan as…
High Court · 8 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 203 -
Thomas Bathurst IJ dismissed the striking-out summons and ordered Everrise to pay Mr Tiong's costs of it, with brief written submissions on the amount.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 10 July 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 21 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal only in part.
Court of Appeal (International) · 5 July 2024 · [2024] SGCA(I) 5 -
Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed KTP's appeal in part and struck out the plaintiff's claim against KTP as time-barred; KTP's other striking-out grounds were not pursued further.
High Court · 10 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 149 -
The court allowed the application in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 7 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 16 -
The Court of Three Judges (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Steven Chong JCA) allowed both applications, found due cause on all six charges, and ordered that Mr Ravi be struck off the roll.
High Court · 31 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 141 -
Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed both applications in part.
High Court · 31 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 144 -
The High Court, in grounds delivered by Tay Yong Kwang JCA, dismissed the appeal against sentence, leaving the aggregate sentence of ten years and four weeks' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane…
High Court · 30 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 140 -
Roger Giles IJ dismissed Kiri's application, so the order setting aside the service out order as regards Mr Ruan became unconditional.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 28 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 15 -
The court allowed Kiri's application in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 20 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 14 -
The court allowed the liquidator's summons in part: it authorised the appointment of the solicitors only from the date of the order, with no retrospective effect, and found the liquidator should…
High Court · 16 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 130 -
The court ordered J to pay T $8,000 for OSM 5, P's estate to pay W $20,000 for OSM 3, T to pay J $40,000 for OSM 2 and OSM 4, and T to pay W $12,000 for W's costs of resisting OSM 4, each sum…
High Court (Family Division) · 3 May 2024 · [2024] SGHCF 20 -
The court, in grounds delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, allowed the Attorney-General's application and ordered that Ms Shahira Banu be struck off the roll.
High Court · 2 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 111 -
Goh Yihan J dismissed all three amendment applications, holding that none of the counterclaims could be brought without permission under s 133(1), which had not been obtained.
High Court · 22 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 105 -
The High Court dismissed the objections and allowed the committee members' application, ordering the sale of the property to Coliwoo.
High Court · 19 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 104 -
The High Court allowed the application and granted an order in terms of OA 170, placing Boldtek under judicial management with the proposed judicial managers.
High Court · 8 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 98 -
Roger Giles IJ allowed the application in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 27 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 7 -
The High Court (Chua Lee Ming J) allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the production order for categories 3 and 6 but upholding it for category 7, so the trustee had to produce the category 7…
High Court · 25 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 85 -
The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Kannan Ramesh JAD and Judith Prakash SJ) dismissed both the appeal and Feima's stay application, SUM 22, leaving Feima's proof admitted at US$32,079,540.97.
Court of Appeal · 5 March 2024 · [2024] SGCA 7 -
The court allowed the application, placed the company under judicial management and appointed Ms Tan as its judicial manager, with the consequential orders sought.
High Court · 4 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 58 -
The High Court dismissed WDL's application, holding that the gaming equipment on board was covered by KfW's mortgage.
High Court · 28 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 56 -
Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed the application and ordered Fusionex Pte Ltd to be wound up by the court under s 125(1)(a) of the IRDA.
High Court · 27 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 51 -
The High Court allowed Rapyd's appeal in part.
High Court · 23 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 49 -
The court allowed the claim, holding that no distribution agreement existed and that Encore had infringed Tiger's copyright in "Moon Man" under s 146(1) of the Copyright Act 2021.
High Court · 9 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 39 -
The court allowed the application in part.
High Court (Family Division) · 31 January 2024 · [2024] SGHCF 7 -
The court dismissed the appeal on care and control and declined to disturb the $9,000 costs order below, but made no order as to costs of the appeal.
High Court (Family Division) · 29 January 2024 · [2024] SGHCF 5 -
Lee Seiu Kin J dismissed the owner's claim, with costs to be heard.
High Court · 19 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 15 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 2 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 1 -
S Mohan J allowed ACE's application only in part.
High Court · 18 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 353 -
Sundaresh Menon CJ dismissed the appeal and affirmed the sentence of eight weeks' imprisonment, a fine of $10,000 (in default one month's imprisonment) and disqualification from holding or obtaining…
High Court · 18 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 354 -
The Appellate Division dismissed Kalairani's appeal and allowed the estate's appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 7 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 40 -
The Court of Appeal (Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment, with Judith Prakash JCA and Robert French IJ) dismissed the appeal, finding no breach of natural justice and no ground to set aside the…
Court of Appeal (International) · 1 December 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 9 -
The High Court dismissed both appeals.
High Court · 29 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 338 -
The court granted the application in its entirety, including an extension of the moratoria until three weeks after the scheme meeting is held, with liberty to apply in respect of that extension.
High Court · 24 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 329 -
The court ordered that unless the claimant provided the security required by the 29 September 2023 judgment on or before 17 November 2023, the proceedings would be dismissed.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 10 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 20 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on 4 August 2023 and set aside the appointment of the PTs' nominees as liquidators.
Court of Appeal · 8 November 2023 · [2023] SGCA 38 -
The court granted the stay on conditions, rejecting the defendant's proposed forms of security.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 2 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 19 -
Choo Han Teck J allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 30 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 311 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and upheld the orders against Mdm Chee on all three transactions.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 33 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the RPA did not permit a foreign person to acquire an interest in residential property by a common intention constructive…
High Court (Appellate Division) · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 34 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction, though for reasons different from the District Judge's.
High Court · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 306 -
The court dismissed the appeal on 24 July 2023 and upheld the Assistant Registrar's orders, including the ancillary order.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 301 -
Sundaresh Menon CJ allowed all three applications for admission, being satisfied that each applicant was a fit and proper person in terms of character.
High Court · 9 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 282 -
The SICC allowed the application in part, ordering the claimant to provide security of S$70,000, rather than the S$80,000 sought, for the defendant's costs up to trial within seven days, staying…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 29 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 15 -
The court dismissed RBI's application in its entirety.
High Court · 29 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 274 -
The court ordered the defendant to pay US$742.73m in compensation to a trust fund, with post-judgment interest at 5.33% a year from 26 May 2023, and declared that it had breached its duty as at 30…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 19 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 14 -
The court dismissed the application to continue OA 152 and stay the other matters, dismissed the fresh evidence application, and dismissed the three registrar's appeals against the refusal of a stay,…
High Court · 15 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 262 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in an ex tempore judgment and upheld every finding below.
Court of Appeal (International) · 13 September 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 6 -
The High Court dismissed the buyers' claim to recover the forfeited $380,000, holding it validly forfeited as a true deposit.
High Court · 12 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 256 -
The High Court dismissed the defendant’s application to strike out the claim.
High Court · 11 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 255 -
The High Court granted the applications, recognising GAP's appointment as the foreign representative of each of the three companies, subject to a reporting requirement.
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 240 -
The High Court dismissed CZO's application to set aside or remit the award, and fixed costs payable to CZP at $20,000 excluding reasonable disbursements.
High Court · 28 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 237 -
Hri Kumar Nair J dismissed SUM 2439 and refused to extend the moratorium, describing the application as futile and as merely delaying the inevitable.
High Court · 25 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 236 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 8 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 28 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in its entirety on 1 February 2023 and later gave written grounds.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 28 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 27 -
The court allowed the executors' claim and declared that the Will and the Codicil had been validly executed by LLT and were proved in solemn form, ordering each party to bear its own costs.
High Court (Family Division) · 19 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 32 -
The court allowed the Prosecution's appeal in part.
High Court · 14 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC 188 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both applications, holding that there was no departure from the basis of the stay.
Court of Appeal · 13 July 2023 · [2023] SGCA 22 -
The court allowed the plaintiffs' claim.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 26 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 9 -
The court granted the Mareva injunction against Mr Wang but limited it to US$2.5m, half the sum claimed, with Parastate's undertaking fortified by a payment of S$50,000 into court, the prescribed…
High Court · 26 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 153 -
The High Court dismissed Encore's application, declined to order that the simplified process did not apply, directed that the claim proceed under Part 2 of the rules, and made no order for costs at…
High Court · 15 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 138 -
The court appointed J and W as deputies over P's personal welfare and property and affairs, to act jointly in all matters with the general powers of deputies, rather than J with Ms Low.
High Court (Family Division) · 11 May 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 24 -
See Kee Oon J dismissed the appeal and affirmed the sentence of two weeks' imprisonment.
High Court · 21 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 109 -
Aedit Abdullah J allowed the sealing applications and granted the moratoria extensions in part, for about three months rather than the six months sought, so that the court could keep the matter under…
High Court · 17 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 98 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals.
Court of Appeal (International) · 14 April 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 3 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal on liability but allowed the appeal on costs.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 4 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 11 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J ordered the plaintiff to pay Mr Salem standard costs of $255,000 for professional fees plus disbursements, including $60,867 for Mr Baldock's fee subject to an undertaking.
High Court · 31 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 68 -
S Mohan J allowed the claim and entered judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants jointly and severally for S$1,167,204, with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ of summons…
High Court · 31 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 76 -
The High Court allowed the appeal.
High Court · 20 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 63 -
Kannan Ramesh JAD allowed the Prosecution's appeal and sentenced the respondent to five weeks' imprisonment on the s 35 charge, in place of the fine.
High Court · 17 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 62 -
S Mohan J dismissed CWP's application in its entirety, finding no merit in any of its grounds.
High Court · 16 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 61 -
The court adjudged the final valuation of Kiri's shares in DyStar to be US$603.8m for the buy-out order, and invited the parties' positions on costs and any consequential directions, noting the Court…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 3 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 4 -
The court held that no prior approval was needed and granted Mr Wang's application, staying the rest of the action pending resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
High Court · 28 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 48 -
The court granted the three applications and made the orders sought, giving the trustees liberty to inspect and take copies of the specified bank records held by each of the three banks.
High Court · 15 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 33 -
On the issue remitted by the Court of Appeal, the court determined the annual tonnage of related products produced by Longsheng to be 56,750 tonnes, and 53,550 tonnes after deducting the 3,200 tonnes…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 8 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 3 -
The court allowed the application.
High Court · 31 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 21 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J held that Ms Phey holds all the shares on a presumed resulting trust for Mr Salem alone and dismissed Mr Nagaraja's claim.
High Court · 6 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 6
In the court record
The reported judgments Allen & Gledhill LLP appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.
- In Civil Procedure Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Insolvency Law Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Contract Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Companies Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Tort Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Criminal Law Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Allen & Gledhill LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.