SBS HOLDINGS, INC v ANANT KUMAR CHOUDARY & 3 Ors

[2024] SGHCR 11 High Court Registrar 11 October 2024 • HC/OA 435/2023 ( HC/SUM 2238/2024 ) • 52 min read
17 cases cited (15 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (7)

Case Significance

In SBS Holdings, Inc v Anant Kumar Choudary and others (A2S Logistics Pte Ltd and another, non-parties) [2024] SGHCR 11, the General Division of the High Court determined HC/SUM 2238/2024, an application for security for costs in Originating Application No 435 of 2023. The application was brought by the second non-party, Ms Shalini Choudary, against the claimant, SBS Holdings Inc, a company registered in Japan. The security was sought in respect of a trial in which SBS is claimant and Ms Choudary, her husband Mr Anant Kumar Choudary and A2S Logistics Pte Ltd are the defendants.

The issue to be determined at trial was whether shares of A2S Logistics Pte Ltd held by Ms Choudary, who is also the sole registered shareholder of the company, are in fact beneficially owned by Mr Choudary. The trial arose from enforcement proceedings taken out by SBS to enforce a judgment against Mr Choudary and other defendants, in which SBS sought the sale and seizure of Ms Choudary's shares on the basis that they were beneficially owned by Mr Choudary. AR Perry Peh heard the matter on 13 September and 2 October 2024 and issued the grounds of decision on 11 October 2024, noting that SBS, as a company registered in Japan, was ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction. WongPartnership LLP acted for the claimant and Allen & Gledhill LLP for the non-party.

Summary

In the General Division of the High Court, Ms Shalini Choudary, a non-party in proceedings brought by SBS Holdings, Inc (a company registered in Japan), applied for security for costs against SBS in respect of a trial concerning whether shares in A2S Logistics Pte Ltd held by her were beneficially owned by her husband. As SBS was ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction the court's discretion was enlivened, leaving the question whether it was just to order security. Assistant Registrar Perry Peh was satisfied that security should not be ordered, citing SBS's strong financial standing and Singapore connections and that its shares in a subsidiary adequately secured the costs, and so dismissed the application.

What was sought in SBS Holdings, Inc v Anant Kumar Choudary [2024] SGHCR 11?

The second non-party, Ms Shalini Choudary, applied in HC/SUM 2238/2024 for security for costs against the claimant, SBS Holdings Inc, a company registered in Japan. AR Perry Peh determined the application in the General Division of the High Court, issuing grounds of decision on 11 October 2024.

What was the trial issue underlying the security for costs application in [2024] SGHCR 11?

The trial issue was whether shares in A2S Logistics Pte Ltd, held by Ms Shalini Choudary as sole registered shareholder, were in fact beneficially owned by her husband Mr Anant Kumar Choudary. The dispute arose from SBS Holdings' enforcement proceedings seeking sale and seizure of those shares.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (17)

SG (3)
[2023] SGHC 178 [2023] SGHCR 15 [2024] SGHC(I) 12
SLR (12)
[1995] 2 SLR(R) 407 [1999] 1 SLR(R) 112 [2001] 3 SLR(R) 208 [2002] 2 SLR(R) 738 [2004] 1 SLR(R) 1 [2004] 2 SLR(R) 427 [2009] 3 SLR(R) 1017 [2011] 4 SLR 580 [2016] 2 SLR 118 [2023] 1 SLR 96 [2023] 4 SLR 77 [2023] 5 SLR 1484
UK (1)
[1990] 1 WLR 552
AU (1)
[2003] FCA 81

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHCR 11)