ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. v SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED & 7 Ors

[2025] SGHC 154 High Court (General Division) 11 August 2025 HC/OA 391/2025 ( HC/SUM 1440/2025,HC/SUM 1486/2025 )
8 cases cited (7 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Philip Jeyaretnam
Charges / claim Civil Procedure, Injunctions
Counsel Drew & Napier LLC, Providence Law Asia LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Choo Qian Ke, Koh Swee Yen, Loh Tian Kai, Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai, Nicole Tan Muzhen, Pang Yi Ching Alessa, Veluri Hari, Vergis S Abraham, Victoria Liu Xin Er, Zerlina Yee Zi Ling

Source: [2025] SGHC 154, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (13)

Parties (9)

Alphard Maritime Ltd. Applicant
IndusInd Bank Limited Defendant
J M Baxi Marine Services Private Limited Defendant
Kotak Alternate Asset Managers Limited Defendant
Kotak India Private Equity Fund Defendant
Kotak Mahindra Trusteeship Services Limited Defendant
Samson Maritime Limited Defendant
Saraswat Co-operative Bank Defendant
Underwater Services Company Limited Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 154 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 11 August 2025 concerning Civil Procedure and Injunctions, specifically addressing injunctions and mareva injunction. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. The case was brought by Alphard Maritime Ltd. (applicant) against IndusInd Bank Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Providence Law Asia LLC and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 8 cases (7 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the Civil Law Act, and the International Arbitration Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.

Summary

Alphard Maritime obtained ex parte freezing and prohibitory injunctions against Samson Maritime and related parties in support of a Singapore maritime arbitration over breach of a settlement agreement for the sale of marine assets. The court set aside both injunctions, finding no real risk of dissipation where the seller resold assets at a higher price and used proceeds to reduce pre-existing liabilities, and that the urgency requirement under s 12A of the International Arbitration Act was not satisfied.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 154?

[2025] SGHC 154 (ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. v SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED & 7 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 11 August 2025 addressing Civil Procedure and Injunctions, specifically injunctions and mareva injunction. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.

Who were the parties in ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. v SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED & 7 Ors ([2025] SGHC 154)?

The applicant in [2025] SGHC 154 was Alphard Maritime Ltd., and the respondent was IndusInd Bank Limited, J M Baxi Marine Services Private Limited. Legal representation included Providence Law Asia LLC and Drew & Napier LLC. The case was decided on 11 August 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 154?

[2025] SGHC 154 was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam in the High Court (General Division) on 11 August 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure and Injunctions.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 154 cite?

[2025] SGHC 154 cites 8 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, Civil Law Act, International Arbitration Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (8)

SLR (7)
[2006] 1 SLR(R) 112 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 518 [2015] 5 SLR 558 [2019] 1 SLR 1081 [2019] 2 SLR 595 [2020] 2 SLR 490 [2023] 1 SLR 1072
UK (1)
[2017] EWHC 94

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 154)