Injunctions

7 cases · February 2025 to January 2026

Overview

Injunctions appeared in 7 reported judgments in Singapore between February 2025 to January 2026. Key sub-topics included Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed (2) and Prohibitory injunction — Order to restrain from impeding or obstructing entry of vehicles (2). The most active judge was Philip Jeyaretnam (4 cases), and the leading firm was Drew & Napier LLC (3 cases).

Data coverage: between February 2025 to January 2026

Which law firms handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?

Drew & Napier LLC leads in injunctions with 3 cases between February 2025 to January 2026, followed by Breakpoint LLC (2 cases) and Aequitas Law LLP (2 cases). 13 firms appeared in injunctions cases during this period.

Who are the leading Injunctions lawyers in Singapore?

Shermaine Ng Shi Min is the most active injunctions lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between February 2025 to January 2026, followed by Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay (2) and Koh Swee Yen (1). 45 lawyers appeared in injunctions cases during this period.

Which judges handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?

Philip Jeyaretnam has handled 4 cases in injunctions between February 2025 to January 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. See Kee Oon (1 case) and Tay Yong Kwang (1 case) are also among the most active. 6 judges heard injunctions cases.

How many injunctions cases are heard in Singapore courts?

Between February 2025 to January 2026, 7 reported judgments involved injunctions in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (7 cases).

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore injunctions cases?

The main sub-topics in Singapore injunctions litigation between February 2025 to January 2026 were Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed (2 cases), Prohibitory injunction — Order to restrain from impeding or obstructing entry of vehicles (2 cases), Mareva injunction — Setting aside (2 cases), Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand (1 case).

Case Volume by Year

5
25
2
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Prohibitory injunction — Order to restrain from impeding or obstructing entry of vehicles 2 cases

Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand 1 case

Mareva injunction — Court’s powers under section 12A of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Conveyancing Act
cited in 1 case
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
New South Wales Conveyancing Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases