GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Chan Seng Onn |
| Charges / claim | Injunctions |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Legis Point LLC, Ang Minghao, Chen Zhihui, Christopher Chong, Isaac Lee, Lim Shack Keong |
Source: [2026] SGHC 21, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 21 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 26 January 2026 concerning Injunctions, specifically addressing interlocutory injunction— whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand. The judgment was delivered by Chan Seng Onn. The case was brought by GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH (applicant) against Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Drew & Napier LLC and Legis Point LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases (2 Singapore, 1 foreign).
[2026] SGHC 21 explained
GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor ([2026] SGHC 21) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 26 January 2026. It is categorised under Injunctions. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 21 about?
GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor ([2026] SGHC 21) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Injunctions — Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
GE Vernova applied for an anti-suit injunction against Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant to restrain proceedings commenced in Bangladesh in breach of an arbitration agreement. The court considered whether the Bangladeshi proceedings were vexatious and oppressive and whether Singapore was the natural forum for the dispute.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 21?
[2026] SGHC 21 (GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 26 January 2026 addressing Injunctions, specifically interlocutory injunction— whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand. The judgment was delivered by Chan Seng Onn.
Who were the parties in GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor ([2026] SGHC 21)?
The applicant in [2026] SGHC 21 was GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH, and the respondent was Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited. Legal representation included Drew & Napier LLC and Legis Point LLC. The case was decided on 26 January 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 21?
[2026] SGHC 21 was delivered by Chan Seng Onn in the High Court (General Division) on 26 January 2026. The case concerned Injunctions.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 21 cite?
[2026] SGHC 21 cites 3 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 21)