GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor

[2026] SGHC 21 High Court (General Division) 26 January 2026 • HC/OA 872/2025 ( HC/SUM 2496/2025 ) • 32 min read
3 cases cited (2 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Injunctions — Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand

Practice Areas

Injunctions

Judges (1)

Chan Seng Onn Delivered

Counsel (7)

Drew & Napier LLC Firm Legis Point LLC Firm Ang Minghao Counsel Respondent Chen Zhihui Counsel Applicant Christopher Chong Counsel Applicant Isaac Lee Counsel Applicant Lim Shack Keong Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited Respondent GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH Applicant Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited Respondent

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 21 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 26 January 2026 concerning Injunctions, specifically addressing interlocutory injunction— whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand. The judgment was delivered by Chan Seng Onn. The case was brought by GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH (applicant) against Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Drew & Napier LLC and Legis Point LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases (2 Singapore, 1 foreign).

Summary

GE Vernova applied for an anti-suit injunction against Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant to restrain proceedings commenced in Bangladesh in breach of an arbitration agreement. The court considered whether the Bangladeshi proceedings were vexatious and oppressive and whether Singapore was the natural forum for the dispute.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 21?

[2026] SGHC 21 (GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 26 January 2026 addressing Injunctions, specifically interlocutory injunction— whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand. The judgment was delivered by Chan Seng Onn.

Who were the parties in GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH v Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited & Anor?

The applicant in [2026] SGHC 21 was GE Vernova Parts & Products GmbH, and the respondent was Anlima Meghnaghat Power Plant Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited. Legal representation included Drew & Napier LLC and Legis Point LLC. The case was decided on 26 January 2026 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 21?

[2026] SGHC 21 was delivered by Chan Seng Onn in the High Court (General Division) on 26 January 2026. The case concerned Injunctions.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 21 cite?

[2026] SGHC 21 cites 3 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions.

Cases Cited (3)

SLR (2)
[2008] 4 SLR(R) 994 [2010] 2 SLR 329
UK (1)
[1903] 2 KB 740

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 21)