SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors
Outcome
Appeal dismissedI dismiss the appeal.
Source: [2025] SGHC 73, High Court (General Division), decided 22 April 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | Asia Ascent Law Corporation, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Nakoorsha Law Corporation, Chia Chee Hyong Leonard, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Hamza Zafar Malik, Michelle Tang Hui Ming, Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir, Rasveen Kaur, Suang Wijaya |
Source: [2025] SGHC 73, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (10)
Parties (25)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 73 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 22 April 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing pleadings. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Singapore A&T Pte. Ltd. and others (plaintiff) against Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Asia Ascent Law Corporation and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP.
[2025] SGHC 73 explained
SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors ([2025] SGHC 73) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 22 April 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 73 about?
SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors ([2025] SGHC 73) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure - Pleadings - Amendment”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
Plaintiffs in two consolidated suits sought to amend their statements of claim against defendants for fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy relating to Senior Fixed Rate Notes issued by a Trikomsel subsidiary. The court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to allow amendments, finding they were belated, would cause prejudice to the respondents who could not rely on limitation defences, and introduced substantive new claims at a late stage.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 73?
[2025] SGHC 73 (SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 22 April 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically pleadings. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors ([2025] SGHC 73)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 73 was Singapore A&T Pte. Ltd., Tan Guan Lee Company Limited, and the defendant was Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Asia Ascent Law Corporation. The case was decided on 22 April 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 73?
[2025] SGHC 73 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (General Division) on 22 April 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 73)