Leading Family Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

The court ordered an equal division of a matrimonial pool of $5,490,113.99, with the wife's interest in the matrimonial home transferred to the husband on payment of $725,122.08 and the husband to…

The High Court allowed both appeals in part.

The High Court ordered that the matrimonial home be sold on the open market within six months and the net proceeds be divided so that the total pool of S$5,894,925.97 is split 60% to the wife and 40%…

The court ordered the matrimonial assets, valued at $47,210,856.83, to be divided 63% to the husband and 37% to the wife, reflecting a base division in the husband's favour adjusted by a 2% uplift to…

The High Court ordered that the matrimonial pool of $24,231,300.64 be divided 55 per cent to the Husband and 45 per cent to the Wife, with the Husband to transfer $9,939,147.66 to the Wife from the…

The High Court allowed both appeals in part.

The High Court ordered that the matrimonial pool of $8,065,790.21 be divided 59.5% to the husband and 40.5% to the wife, with the husband to pay the wife $3,051,820.35.

The court ordered the matrimonial pool divided 53% to the husband and 47% to the wife, ordered the Hillington Property sold with proceeds split in that ratio, required the husband to account for half…

The court ordered joint custody, sole care and control to the wife with the interim access terms continued plus school-holiday access, valued the pool at S$732,565.51, awarded the wife 25% and…

The court allowed the application in part.

The Family Court dismissed the wife's application in MSS 1638/2025 because she had not shown that the husband neglected or refused to provide reasonable maintenance.

The court ordered an equal division of a matrimonial pool of $5,490,113.99, with the wife's interest in the matrimonial home transferred to the husband on payment of $725,122.08 and the husband to…

The High Court allowed both appeals in part.

The High Court ordered that the matrimonial pool of $24,231,300.64 be divided 55 per cent to the Husband and 45 per cent to the Wife, with the Husband to transfer $9,939,147.66 to the Wife from the…

The court ordered the matrimonial pool divided 53% to the husband and 47% to the wife, ordered the Hillington Property sold with proceeds split in that ratio, required the husband to account for half…

The High Court allowed both appeals in part.

The court ordered joint custody, sole care and control to the wife with the interim access terms continued plus school-holiday access, valued the pool at S$732,565.51, awarded the wife 25% and…

Dedar Singh Gill J ordered joint custody of the children with sole care and control to the husband, and directed further submissions on the wife's access.

Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD allowed the mother's application in part and varied the earlier orders.

The Family Court ordered joint custody, with care and control to the husband from the start of February 2026, and gave the wife alternate weekend overnight access, up to 2 weekday evenings a week,…

Dedar Singh Gill J ordered joint custody of the children with sole care and control to the husband, and directed further submissions on the wife's access.

Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD allowed the mother's application in part and varied the earlier orders.

The Family Court ordered joint custody, with care and control to the husband from the start of February 2026, and gave the wife alternate weekend overnight access, up to 2 weekday evenings a week,…

The High Court dismissed the Husband's appeal in full, leaving the District Judge's orders on care and control, access and the division of matrimonial assets unchanged.

The court ordered shared care and control of L from 1 January 2026, with the husband having care from Wednesday after school to Saturday at 8pm and the wife for the rest of the week, and made…

The Magistrate allowed the application and ordered the Father to pay $1200 per month, $600 for each child, on or before the last day of each month from 1 February 2026, directly into the children's…

The court allowed the Wife's application in part.

Kwek Mean Luck J dismissed the wife's application to file a further affidavit.

The court valued the pool at S$1,698,386.99 and ordered it divided 70% to the mother and 30% to the father, leaving the parties to work out how to effect it.

Choo Han Teck J ordered a 60:40 division in the wife's favour, after a 10% uplift for the husband's non-disclosure, and ordered the Australian apartments sold with proceeds split in the same ratio.

The Appellate Division allowed the Husband's appeal in part.

The Family Court ordered joint custody with care and control to the Wife and supervised access for the Husband, and ordered him to pay $1,050 a month for the child plus half of the school fees from 1…

The court ordered that the matrimonial pool of S$8,804,867.30 be divided 54.495% to the wife and 45.505% to the husband.

The Appellate Division allowed the husband's appeal in part.

The High Court allowed the wife's appeal in part: it set aside the order that each party keep their own assets, included the Disputed Property in the pool, ordered it sold within four months with…

The court allowed both applications in part and varied the 2016 Order.

The Family Court dismissed the husband's application to vary the consent order and ordered him to pay the wife costs fixed at $1,000 (all-in).

The High Court dismissed the appeal and left the District Judge's orders on asset division, child maintenance, apportionment and tertiary education expenses in place.

The court declined to vary the consent order, but ordered that the husband must not dispose of or spend the $20.5m obtained from the re-mortgage without giving the wife seven days' notice, and that…

The High Court dismissed the wife's appeal, leaving the children in the local primary school, and made no order as to costs.

The court allowed the Husband's appeal in part, recalibrating the parties' direct contributions to the assets other than the matrimonial home to an equal split, so that the Wife's total share became…

The High Court allowed the appeal.

The High Court dismissed the wife's appeal, holding that she was not entitled to the injunction, and said it would hear the parties on costs.

The High Court dismissed the appeal in substance: it refused both applications to adduce new evidence, left the valuation and the access arrangements as ordered below, gave the husband liberty to…

The court ordered that the matrimonial home and the four overseas properties be sold by 31 March 2024, with net proceeds and interim rental income shared 77.5% to the husband and 22.5% to the wife;…

The Family Court dismissed the Mother's application for a PPO and a Domestic Exclusion Order, and made no order as to costs because neither party sought them.

The court allowed the husband's application and granted the Personal Protection Order against the wife, ordered both spouses to attend counselling, and called for a Preliminary Assessment Report with…

The Family Court dismissed the Husband's application in SSP 2434 because it was not necessary to make the protective orders for the Husband or the children.

Magistrate Soh Kian Peng dismissed both applications.

The District Judge dismissed all of the mother's applications and dismissed the father's application for a protection order on behalf of the child.

The court ordered shared care and control of L from 1 January 2026, with the husband having care from Wednesday after school to Saturday at 8pm and the wife for the rest of the week, and made…

The High Court allowed the appeal in part.

The court allowed the appeal in part and varied the order below.

The court allowed the appeal in part and varied the order below.

The court ordered that the husband's weekend access remain as under the interim access orders, from Saturday 3.00pm to Sunday 1.00pm, and that he pay the wife $14,708.29 per month for the children's…

The court ordered the Wife to pay the Husband $336,903.06 within one month of final judgment as part of the division of matrimonial assets, valued at $3,883,752.94 and divided 61.5% to the Wife and…

The court ordered the matrimonial pool of $998,787.52 to be divided 58% to the Wife and 42% to the Husband, giving the Wife an option to buy out the Husband's share of the flat, failing which it was…

District Judge Kevin Ho divided the matrimonial pool of $1,442,057.30 in the ratio 55 (wife) to 45 (husband).

The Family Court ordered that the husband was entitled to $134,065.51 as his share of the matrimonial assets, to be paid by a transfer from the wife's CPF Ordinary Account, with each party otherwise…

The court allowed the Father's application in SSP 643 in part: K was granted a PPO against the Mother limited to 3 years, until 11 November 2028, and both the Mother and the Father were ordered to…

The Family Court dismissed both PPO applications and ordered costs against the applicants: [A] to pay $16,000 and [B] to pay $22,000 to [C] by 16 July 2025.

The District Judge dismissed the application because neither requirement for a PPO was met: there was no family violence and no need for an order.

The Family Court ordered that the wife's five Personal Protection Order applications remain struck off the hearing list and refused her permission to reinstate them.

The Assistant Registrar granted the application and ordered substituted service by email or via Singpass as prayed.

The court allowed the wife's costs claim in part.

The High Court allowed the Husband's appeal in part.

The court ordered the Husband to pay the Wife's costs of the ancillary proceedings fixed at S$5,000 on a standard basis, and $2,000 on an indemnity basis for her costs of responding to AOM5.

District Judge Kevin Ho divided the matrimonial pool of $1,442,057.30 in the ratio 55 (wife) to 45 (husband).

The Family Court ordered that the husband was entitled to $134,065.51 as his share of the matrimonial assets, to be paid by a transfer from the wife's CPF Ordinary Account, with each party otherwise…

The court allowed the application in part, only to the extent of ordering the father to pay $13,200 as a lump sum of backdated maintenance, being his half share of the shadow support cost from August…

The court allowed the Father's application in SSP 643 in part: K was granted a PPO against the Mother limited to 3 years, until 11 November 2028, and both the Mother and the Father were ordered to…

The court dismissed the application for a PPO and, as an SAO can only be made with a PPO, the application for an SAO also failed.

The Family Court dismissed SSP 61/2026 in its entirety.

The court allowed the Father's application in SSP 643 in part: K was granted a PPO against the Mother limited to 3 years, until 11 November 2028, and both the Mother and the Father were ordered to…

The court dismissed the application for a PPO and, as an SAO can only be made with a PPO, the application for an SAO also failed.

The Family Court dismissed SSP 61/2026 in its entirety.

The High Court dismissed the husband's appeal in its entirety and upheld the judgment of judicial separation, although it held that the District Judge erred in law on the threshold and on the test…

The Family Court dismissed the wife's claim for divorce because she had not proved, on a balance of probabilities, that it was unreasonable to expect her to go on living with the husband in light of…

The High Court dismissed the appeals of the husband and the co-respondent.

The court ordered the division of matrimonial assets in the rounded ratio of 94.9% to the husband and 5.1% to the wife.

The court ordered the matrimonial assets to be divided 60% to the husband and 40% to the wife, with the parties to agree consequential orders.

The court ordered joint custody with sole care and control to the wife and four hours of unsupervised Saturday access for the husband, and ordered the husband to transfer S$6,955,229 to the wife…

Tan Siong Thye SJ refused Mdm Ng's application in OA 41 and allowed Mdm Chen's application in OA 44 in part, with modifications, declaring that the beneficial interests follow the legal title: Mdm…

The Appellate Division dismissed both appeals, upholding the order for sale with the proceeds divided equally and the dismissal of Mr Gunawan's claim to sole beneficial ownership.

The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' claim in part and dismissed the counterclaim.

The High Court dismissed the wife's appeal, so the Singapore divorce proceedings were not stayed.

The High Court (Family Division) dismissed the husband's appeal, upholding the finding that the Singapore courts had jurisdiction to hear the divorce, with costs submissions to be filed within 14…

The court dismissed the Husband's application to set aside the AM Order and ordered costs of $2,000 inclusive of disbursements.

The court valued the pool at S$1,698,386.99 and ordered it divided 70% to the mother and 30% to the father, leaving the parties to work out how to effect it.

The court ordered joint custody with sole care and control to the wife and four hours of unsupervised Saturday access for the husband, and ordered the husband to transfer S$6,955,229 to the wife…

The court ordered joint custody, with the Wife having sole care and control and the Husband having access; the Child was to remain in Hong Kong for now, any relocation needed consensus, the Wife was…

The High Court dismissed the Husband's appeal in its entirety, together with his three summonses, and allowed the Wife's appeal and her application to adduce fresh evidence, ordering that…

The court allowed the appeal in part.

The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed both summonses but found largely in the Husband's favour on the appeal, so he succeeded in part overall.

The court ordered the Husband to pay the Wife costs fixed at $100 for the late attendance on 12 August 2026, and later ordered him to pay her further costs fixed at $500 (all-in) for his absence from…

Magistrate Soh Kian Peng dismissed both applications.

The High Court allowed both appeals in part.

The court ordered joint custody, sole care and control to the wife with the interim access terms continued plus school-holiday access, valued the pool at S$732,565.51, awarded the wife 25% and…

The court dismissed the application, finding family violence on two occasions but that a protection order was not necessary.

Magistrate Allen Chong allowed the application and granted a Personal Protection Order restraining the husband from committing family violence against the wife.

The Appellate Division (Kannan Ramesh JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed the appeal in an ex tempore judgment.

The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed both summonses but found largely in the Husband's favour on the appeal, so he succeeded in part overall.

The Appellate Division, in a judgment delivered by Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD, dismissed the appeal.

The Appellate Division allowed the Wife's appeal in part.

The Family Court allowed the Father's application in part.

The court ordered joint custody with care and control to the wife and day access for the husband, and awarded the wife 40% of an asset pool of $1,738,817.95, with the first right to take over the…

The District Judge made no order on SUM 3674/2024 and no order as to its costs.

The court ordered joint custody with care and control to the wife and day access for the husband, and awarded the wife 40% of an asset pool of $1,738,817.95, with the first right to take over the…