XZI v XZJ
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Soh Kian Peng |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Infinitus Law Corporation, Ng Khai Lee, Phyllis Wong Shi Ting |
Source: [2026] SGFC 28, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2026] SGFC 28 is a Family Court decision dated 27 February 2026 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing costs and substituted service. The judgment was delivered by Soh Kian Peng. The case was brought by XZI (applicant) against XZJ (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Infinitus Law Corporation.
[2026] SGFC 28 explained
XZI v XZJ ([2026] SGFC 28) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 27 February 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGFC 28 about?
XZI v XZJ ([2026] SGFC 28) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Costs” and “Family Law — Substituted Service”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
A wife applied for substituted service of divorce documents on her husband via email and Singpass after personal service could not be effected because the husband was not at his registered address and his solicitors declined to accept service. The court granted the order, finding personal service was impractical, and reserved the issue of costs to the judge hearing any stay application given the possibility the husband may have had legitimate reasons for not accepting service.
What was decided in [2026] SGFC 28?
[2026] SGFC 28 (XZI v XZJ) is a Family Court decision from 27 February 2026 addressing Family Law, specifically costs and substituted service. The judgment was delivered by Soh Kian Peng.
Who were the parties in XZI v XZJ ([2026] SGFC 28)?
The applicant in [2026] SGFC 28 was XZI, and the respondent was XZJ. Legal representation included Infinitus Law Corporation. The case was decided on 27 February 2026 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGFC 28?
[2026] SGFC 28 was delivered by Soh Kian Peng in the Family Court on 27 February 2026. The case concerned Family Law.
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 28)