XSP v XSQ
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Edmund Chew |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Gloria James-Civetta & Co, Beverly Goh, Chong Xin Yi, Gloria James-Civetta, Hoon Shu Mei, Sheryl Keith Sandhu |
Source: [2025] SGFC 107, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 107 is a Family Court decision dated 6 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing divorce and grounds for divorce. The judgment was delivered by Edmund Chew. The case was brought by XSP (plaintiff) against XSQ (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Gloria James-Civetta & Co and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 5 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Limitation Act.
[2025] SGFC 107 explained
XSP v XSQ ([2025] SGFC 107) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 6 October 2025. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGFC 107 about?
XSP v XSQ ([2025] SGFC 107) is a Family Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Divorce” and “Family Law — Grounds for divorce — Behaviour”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGFC 107 consider?
The judgment refers to Limitation Act (Cap 163). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
After a 31-year marriage, the wife sought divorce on the ground of the husband's unreasonable behaviour under s 95(3)(b) of the Women's Charter, citing various incidents including financial abuse, controlling behaviour, verbal abuse, and a failure to provide emotional support. The trial spanned six hearing days with three additional witnesses. The Family Court dismissed the wife's claim for divorce, finding she had not established that the husband's behaviour was such that she could not reasonably be expected to live with him, and awarded costs of $12,000 to the husband.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 107?
[2025] SGFC 107 (XSP v XSQ) is a Family Court decision from 6 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically divorce and grounds for divorce. The judgment was delivered by Edmund Chew.
Who were the parties in XSP v XSQ ([2025] SGFC 107)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGFC 107 was XSP, and the defendant was XSQ. Legal representation included Gloria James-Civetta & Co and Drew & Napier LLC. The case was decided on 6 October 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 107?
[2025] SGFC 107 was delivered by Edmund Chew in the Family Court on 6 October 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 107 cite?
[2025] SGFC 107 cites 5 prior decisions. It references Limitation Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 107)