YIP v YIQ
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Soh Kian Peng |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
Source: [2026] SGFC 126, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
YIP v YIQ [2026] SGFC 126 is a decision of the Family Court delivered by Magistrate Soh Kian Peng on 9 September 2026, after a trial on 15 July 2026. In SSP 905 of 2026, the Husband applied under Part 7 of the Women's Charter 1961 for a Personal Protection Order against the Wife. He alleged emotional or psychological abuse through accusations of an affair with his sister and numerous vulgar and degrading WhatsApp messages, including artificial intelligence-made images and videos. The issues were whether the Wife had committed or was likely to commit family violence under s 60A(1) and whether an order was necessary for his protection or personal safety. The court found both requirements proven on a balance of probabilities, granted the Personal Protection Order, ordered both parties to attend counselling and called for a Preliminary Assessment Report with a view to a Mandatory Treatment Order.
[2026] SGFC 126 explained
YIP v YIQ ([2026] SGFC 126) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 9 September 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGFC 126 about?
YIP v YIQ ([2026] SGFC 126) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Family Violence — Orders for Protection”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
The Family Court heard an application (SSP 905 of 2026) by a Husband for a Personal Protection Order against his Wife, who had sent him numerous vulgar text messages and artificial intelligence-made sexual images and videos of him and his sister over some four months. The court found she had inflicted emotional or psychological abuse and that an order was necessary for his protection. It granted the Personal Protection Order, ordered both parties to attend counselling and called for a Preliminary Assessment Report with a view to a Mandatory Treatment Order.
What was YIP v YIQ [2026] SGFC 126 about?
It was a Family Court application by a Husband for a Personal Protection Order against his Wife, based on some four months of vulgar text messages and artificial intelligence-made explicit images and videos of him and his sister sent over WhatsApp.
What orders did the court make in [2026] SGFC 126?
The Family Court granted the Husband's Personal Protection Order, ordered both the Husband and the Wife to attend counselling, and called for a Preliminary Assessment Report with a view towards granting a Mandatory Treatment Order against the Wife.
Cases Cited (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 126)