YBA v YBB
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
In YBA v YBB [2026] SGFC 48, decided on 2 April 2026, District Judge Kelyn Lee of the Family Court varied a consent order originally made on 17 May 2016 — approximately nine years earlier — to establish more detailed and structured access arrangements for a father with his daughter (born June 2015, aged 10 at the time of hearing), to adjust child maintenance in light of the child's evolving needs, and to consider rescission of nominal spousal maintenance. The father's access time with the child was increased in the variation, and the court cited 13 Singapore authorities in addressing the principles governing variation of consent orders on access, child maintenance, and wife's maintenance.
Summary
Parents filed cross-applications to vary a 2016 consent order governing access and maintenance for their 10-year-old daughter, whose needs had materially changed since the original orders were made when she was an infant. District Judge Kelyn Lee increased the Father's access time, reduced monthly child maintenance payable by the Father, adjusted ad hoc expense-sharing arrangements (including a $20,000 annual cap on agreed activities), and declined to rescind the nominal $1 per month spousal maintenance. Both parents have filed cross-appeals against the decision.
On what basis can a Singapore court vary a consent order on child access and maintenance made almost a decade earlier?
In YBA v YBB [2026] SGFC 48, District Judge Kelyn Lee varied a 2016 consent order nine years later, increasing the father's access time and adjusting child maintenance for a daughter born June 2015 on the basis that changed circumstances and the child's evolving needs justified variation of the original agreed terms.
Cases Cited (13)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 48)