XPR v XPQ
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Soh Kian Peng |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Gurdip, Gill & Sew, Jagjit Singh Gill s/o Harchand Singh |
Source: [2026] SGFC 88, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
XPR v XPQ [2026] SGFC 88 involved two applications before Magistrate Soh Kian Peng in the Family Court: SSP 698 of 2025, the husband's application for a Personal Protection Order, Domestic Exclusion Order, Counselling Order and Mandatory Treatment Order against the wife, and SSP 699 of 2025, his application to revoke a Personal Protection Order the wife had obtained against him more than a decade earlier. As a preliminary matter, the magistrate addressed the husband's use of generative artificial intelligence in preparing the written statements he submitted to court for the trial, an issue that arose at the close of trial in connection with the wife's counselling reports. The trial was heard over 10, 11, 18 and 22 July and 3 September 2025, with grounds of decision issued on 30 June 2026, citing six authorities — five of them Singapore decisions — and the Evidence Act.
[2026] SGFC 88 explained
XPR v XPQ ([2026] SGFC 88) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 30 June 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGFC 88 about?
XPR v XPQ ([2026] SGFC 88) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Family Procedure — Costs”, “Family Law — Family Violence — Orders for Protection”, “Family Law — Family Violence — Application to Revoke Personal Protection Order”, and “Family Law — Family Procedure — Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in drafting Witness Statements/Affidavits”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGFC 88 consider?
The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGFC 88 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2026] SGFC 63. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What preliminary issue did the Family Court address in XPR v XPQ [2026] SGFC 88?
Magistrate Soh Kian Peng addressed the husband's use of generative artificial intelligence in preparing written statements submitted for the trial of SSP 698 and SSP 699 of 2025, an issue that arose at the close of trial in connection with the wife's counselling reports.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (6)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 88)