Rasveen Kaur
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Rasveen Kaur. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Rasveen Kaur appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure and Trusts, and Rasveen Kaur acted for the respondent in 2 and the defendant in 2.
- Reported cases
- 8
- Courts
- High Court, High Court (Appellate Division), High Court Registrar
- Period
- August 2023 to March 2026
Source: derived from 8 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Rasveen Kaur — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Rasveen Kaur appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 8 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we dismiss the Application and order the applicants to pay the following costs to the respondents:(a) $12,000 (all-in) to the first respondent;(b) $10,000 (all-in) to the fifth respondent; and (c) $12,000 (all-in) to the sixth respondent.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 18 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 8 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed -
“I dismiss the appeal.”
High Court · 22 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC 73 · Counsel for the defendant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Rasveen Kaur practice?
Civil Procedure 4 cases
Reported between July 2024 and March 2026.
Trusts 2 cases
Reported between August 2023 and October 2024.
Counsel for the respondent (2)
-
The Appellate Division dismissed the application for an extension of time to appeal.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 18 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 8 -
The court, in grounds delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, allowed the Attorney-General's application and ordered that Ms Shahira Banu be struck off the roll.
High Court · 2 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 111
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The Registrar allowed the amendment application, granting both the undisputed and the disputed amendments.
High Court Registrar · 30 December 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 40 -
The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Assistant Registrar's refusal of the substantive amendments, and reserved costs to the trial judge.
High Court · 22 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC 73
Counsel for the applicant (2)
-
The High Court granted the winding-up application as orally amended and, exercising its discretion under s 134(a) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018, appointed the interim…
High Court · 30 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 195 -
The court found that the couple held equal beneficial interests in the property and dismissed the application, refusing both the declaration and the setting aside of the enforcement order.
High Court · 10 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 252
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part and varied the order.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 17 July 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 21
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
Audrey Lim J rejected both parties' claimed agreements and declared that, on a presumed resulting trust, Khoo holds 38.38% and Lim 61.62% of the beneficial interest.
High Court · 23 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 233