Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)

[2025] SGHC 195 High Court (General Division) 30 September 2025 • HC/OA 828/2025|HC/CWU 356/2025 • 26 min read
7 cases cited (6 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Insolvency Law — Winding up — Winding-up order Insolvency Law — Winding up — Liquidator — Whether nominated liquidator should be appointed

Practice Areas

Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Philip Jeyaretnam Delivered

Counsel (15)

Dauntless Law LLC Firm Eldan Law LLP Firm Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office Firm JC Asia LLC Firm Meritus Law LLC Firm Providence Law Asia LLC Firm Daniel Tan Shi Min (Daniel Chen Shimin) Counsel Plaintiff James Lek Kai Sheng Counsel Third Party Kwang Jia Min Counsel Third Party Kyle Chong Kee Cheng Counsel Plaintiff Lye May-Yee Jaime Counsel Applicant Rasveen Kaur Counsel Applicant Sarah Khan Counsel Third Party Suresh Divyanathan Counsel Third Party Theenan Narendra Mudaliar Counsel Third Party

Parties (13)

AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management) Defendant The Work Boulevard CQ Pte Ltd Third Party Alicia Tsao Wen Hui Applicant Cameron Lindsay Duncan Plaintiff Choo Sau Theng Applicant David Dong-Won Kim Plaintiff Goon Keng Sun Third Party Joshua Joseph Jeyaraj Plaintiff Low Sew Hsia Applicant Lyly Applicant Soh Hiok Kim Dulcie Crispina Applicant Tan Aik Khien, Victor Applicant Tan Ying Ying Applicant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 195 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 30 September 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. The case was brought by Cameron Lindsay Duncan and others (plaintiff) against AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management) (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Meritus Law LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases (6 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Summary

Following interim judicial managers' report that statutory objectives of judicial management could not be achieved for AmazingTech Pte Ltd, the court ordered the company wound up and appointed the interim judicial managers as liquidators. The court rejected objections from certain non-parties who alleged bias on the part of the IJMs, finding no reasonable perception of bias and that continuity of the IJMs would save time and costs.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 195?

[2025] SGHC 195 (Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 30 September 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.

Who were the parties in Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 195 was Cameron Lindsay Duncan, David Dong-Won Kim, and the defendant was AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management). Legal representation included Eldan Law LLP and Dauntless Law LLC. The case was decided on 30 September 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 195?

[2025] SGHC 195 was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam in the High Court (General Division) on 30 September 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 195 cite?

[2025] SGHC 195 cites 7 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Statutes Cited

Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
Restructuring and Dissolution Act

Cases Cited (7)

SLR (6)
[2004] 1 SLR(R) 671 [2022] 3 SLR 539 [2023] 2 SLR 554 [2023] 4 SLR 862 [2024] 3 SLR 1228 [2025] 3 SLR 1431
UK (1)
[2019] EWHC 954

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 195)