Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)

Q: Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 195 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2025] SGHC 195 High Court (General Division) 30 September 2025 HC/OA 828/2025 · HC/CWU 356/2025 26 min read

7 cases cited (6 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	30 September 2025
Judge	Philip Jeyaretnam
Charges / claim	Insolvency Law
Counsel	Dauntless Law LLC, Eldan Law LLP, Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office, JC Asia LLC, Meritus Law LLC, Providence Law Asia LLC, Daniel Tan Shi Min (Daniel Chen Shimin), James Lek Kai Sheng, Kwang Jia Min, Kyle Chong Kee Cheng, Lye May-Yee Jaime, Rasveen Kaur, Sarah Khan, Suresh Divyanathan, Theenan Narendra Mudaliar

Source: [2025] SGHC 195, High Court (General Division), decided 30 September 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Insolvency Law — Winding up — Winding-up order Insolvency Law — Winding up — Liquidator — Whether nominated liquidator should be appointed

Practice Areas

Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Philip Jeyaretnam Delivered

Counsel (15)

Dauntless Law LLC Firm Eldan Law LLP Firm Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office Firm JC Asia LLC Firm Meritus Law LLC Firm Providence Law Asia LLC Firm Daniel Tan Shi Min (Daniel Chen Shimin) Counsel Plaintiff James Lek Kai Sheng Counsel Third Party Kwang Jia Min Counsel Third Party Kyle Chong Kee Cheng Counsel Plaintiff Lye May-Yee Jaime Counsel Applicant Rasveen Kaur Counsel Applicant Sarah Khan Counsel Third Party Suresh Divyanathan Counsel Third Party Theenan Narendra Mudaliar Counsel Third Party

Parties (13)

AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management) Defendant The Work Boulevard CQ Pte Ltd Third Party Alicia Tsao Wen Hui Applicant Cameron Lindsay Duncan Plaintiff Choo Sau Theng Applicant David Dong-Won Kim Plaintiff Goon Keng Sun Third Party Joshua Joseph Jeyaraj Plaintiff Low Sew Hsia Applicant Lyly Applicant Soh Hiok Kim Dulcie Crispina Applicant Tan Aik Khien, Victor Applicant Tan Ying Ying Applicant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 195 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 30 September 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. The case was brought by Cameron Lindsay Duncan and others (plaintiff) against AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management) (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Meritus Law LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases (6 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

[2025] SGHC 195 explained

Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT) ([2025] SGHC 195) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 30 September 2025. It is categorised under Insolvency Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGHC 195 about?

Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT) ([2025] SGHC 195) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Insolvency Law — Winding up — Winding-up order” and “Insolvency Law — Winding up — Liquidator — Whether nominated liquidator should be appointed”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 195 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2025] SGHC 195?

Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 195 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

Following interim judicial managers' report that statutory objectives of judicial management could not be achieved for AmazingTech Pte Ltd, the court ordered the company wound up and appointed the interim judicial managers as liquidators. The court rejected objections from certain non-parties who alleged bias on the part of the IJMs, finding no reasonable perception of bias and that continuity of the IJMs would save time and costs.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 195?

[2025] SGHC 195 (Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 30 September 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically winding up. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.

Who were the parties in Cameron Lindsay Duncan & 2 Ors v AMAZINGTECH PTE. LTD. (UNDER INTERIM JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT) ([2025] SGHC 195)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 195 was Cameron Lindsay Duncan, David Dong-Won Kim, and the defendant was AmazingTech Pte Ltd (under interim judicial management). Legal representation included Eldan Law LLP and Dauntless Law LLC. The case was decided on 30 September 2025 in the High Court (General Division).