Balbeer Singh Mangat & Anor v TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND III LTD & 5 Ors

[2026] SGHC(A) 8 High Court (Appellate Division) 18 March 2026 AD/OA 49/2025 28 min read

16 cases cited (15 SG, 1 foreign)

Outcome

Application dismissed

we dismiss the Application and order the applicants to pay the following costs to the respondents:(a) $12,000 (all-in) to the first respondent;(b) $10,000 (all-in) to the fifth respondent; and (c) $12,000 (all-in) to the sixth respondent.

Source: [2026] SGHC(A) 8, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 18 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	High Court (Appellate Division)
Decided	18 March 2026
Judges	See Kee Oon, Woo Bih Li
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure
Outcome	Application dismissed
Sentence / award	$12,000
Counsel	Bird & Bird ATMD LLP, Meritus Law LLC, Prolegis LLC, Balakrishnan Ashok Kumar, Charlene Wee Swee Ting, Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen, Ker Yanguang, Lim Tahn Lin Alfred, Loh Song-En Samuel, Lye May-Yee Jaime, Nee Hoong Yi Adriel, Rasveen Kaur, Shu Kit, Tan Yi Liang

Source: [2026] SGHC(A) 8, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 18 March 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Extension of time

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (2)

See Kee Oon Delivered Woo Bih Li Coram

Counsel (14)

Bird & Bird ATMD LLP Firm Meritus Law LLC Firm Prolegis LLC Firm Balakrishnan Ashok Kumar Counsel Respondent Charlene Wee Swee Ting Counsel Respondent Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen Counsel Respondent Ker Yanguang Counsel Respondent Lim Tahn Lin Alfred Counsel Respondent Loh Song-En Samuel Counsel Respondent Lye May-Yee Jaime Counsel Respondent Nee Hoong Yi Adriel Counsel Respondent Rasveen Kaur Counsel Respondent Shu Kit Counsel Respondent Tan Yi Liang Counsel Respondent

Parties (8)

ACE Spring Investments Limited Respondent Qualgro Pte Ltd Respondent Tembusu Growth Fund III Ltd Respondent Balbeer Singh Mangat Applicant Eric Alfred Schaer Respondent Jagdish Murli Chanrai Respondent Nicolas Kim-Hoang Nguyen Respondent Sirjit Gill Applicant

[2026] SGHC(A) 8 explained

Balbeer Singh Mangat & Anor v TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND III LTD & 5 Ors ([2026] SGHC(A) 8) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Appellate Division) on 18 March 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC(A) 8 about?

Balbeer Singh Mangat & Anor v TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND III LTD & 5 Ors ([2026] SGHC(A) 8) is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Extension of time”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC(A) 8 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 277. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Cases Cited (16)

SG (6)

[2001] SGHC 87 [2005] SGCA 3 [2008] SGHC 72 [2023] SGHC(A) 37 [2023] SGHC(A) 5 [2024] SGHC 277

SLR (9)

[1991] 2 SLR(R) 260 [2001] 3 SLR(R) 355 [2004] 2 SLR(R) 505 [2004] 4 SLR(R) 7 [2006] 2 SLR(R) 565 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 757 [2014] 1 SLR 860 [2014] 4 SLR 202 [2020] 5 SLR 354

UK (1)

[1965] 1 WLR 8