AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH v David Dong-Won Kim & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kristy Tan |
| Charges / claim | Insolvency Law |
| Counsel | Gabriel Law Corporation, Oon & Bazul LLP, Ee Yong Chun Bernard, Han Guangyuan Keith, Lye Yu Min, Manoj Prakash Nandwani |
Source: [2025] SGHC 263, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 263 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 26 December 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing winding up. The judgment was delivered by Kristy Tan. The case was brought by Avinderpal Singh s/o Ranjit Singh (applicant) against Cameron Lindsay Duncan and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Gabriel Law Corporation and Oon & Bazul LLP. The judgment cites 4 cases and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
[2025] SGHC 263 explained
AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH v David Dong-Won Kim & Anor ([2025] SGHC 263) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 26 December 2025. It is categorised under Insolvency Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 263 about?
AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH v David Dong-Won Kim & Anor ([2025] SGHC 263) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Insolvency Law — Winding up — Proof of debt — Liquidators’ partial rejection of proof of debt”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 263 consider?
The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 263 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 110 and [2024] SGHC 117. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
A shareholder and former director of a company in liquidation applied to reverse the liquidators' partial rejection of his proof of debt, which included claims for director's fees, petty cash reimbursements, and storage expenses. The court dismissed the application, finding the applicant failed to discharge the burden of proving his claims with sufficient evidence, particularly as many claims were unsupported by contemporaneous documentation and were inconsistent with prior proceedings.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 263?
[2025] SGHC 263 (AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH v David Dong-Won Kim & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 26 December 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically winding up. The judgment was delivered by Kristy Tan.
Who were the parties in AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH v David Dong-Won Kim & Anor ([2025] SGHC 263)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 263 was Avinderpal Singh s/o Ranjit Singh, and the respondent was Cameron Lindsay Duncan, David Dong-Won Kim. Legal representation included Gabriel Law Corporation and Oon & Bazul LLP. The case was decided on 26 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 263?
[2025] SGHC 263 was delivered by Kristy Tan in the High Court (General Division) on 26 December 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 263 cite?
[2025] SGHC 263 cites 4 prior decisions. It references Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (4)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 263)