T

Teo Jason

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Teo Jason. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Teo Jason appears as counsel of record in 9 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Arbitration and Contract, and Teo Jason acted for the defendant in 3 and the respondent in 2.

Reported cases
9
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(I), SGHC(A), SGCA(I)
Period
January 2023 to September 2026

Source: derived from 9 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Teo Jason — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Teo Jason appeared

Counsel for the defendant
3 cases
Counsel for the respondent
2 cases
Counsel for the claimant
2 cases
Counsel for the young independent counsel
1 case
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
2
Claim allowed
1
Claim dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 4 of 9 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGHC(A) 23 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismiss the appeals by ES in their entirety.”

Ever Strategy Consultants Limited v Corporación Crambo, S.A. & 4 Ors · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the respondent
[2026] SGCA(I) 2 Appeal dismissed

“For the reasons given above, we dismiss this appeal on all grounds.”

KBP BIOSCIENCES PTE. LTD. & Anor v NOVO NORDISK A/S · SGCA(I) · · Counsel for the respondent
[2024] SGHC 46 Claim allowed

“Accordingly, the defendant shall pay to the claimants the sum of $2,319,484 and interest thereon pursuant to s 12(1) of the CLA, calculated at 5.33% per annum from 26 September 2022 to the date of this judgment.”

ENVY ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) & 3 Ors v CH BIOVEST PTE. LTD. · SGHC · · Counsel for the young independent counsel
[2023] SGHC 12 Claim dismissed

“After considering the evidence adduced at trial and parties’ written submissions, I dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim.”

B HIGH HOUSE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD v MCDP PHOENIX SERVICES PTE LTD & Anor · SGHC · · Counsel for the plaintiff

Parties in these cases

Huang Zhenhua3 KBP Biosciences Pte. Ltd.3 Novo Nordisk A/S3 Victor Diamond2 Guillermo Liberman2 Harder Road Inc.2 Balboa Hospitality Services Ltd.2 Corporación Crambo, S.A.2

What areas of law does Teo Jason practice?

Civil Procedure 4 cases

Reported between November 2023 and September 2026.

Arbitration 3 cases

Reported between November 2023 and May 2026.

9
Appearances
2018
Year of Call
2
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (2)

Counsel for the defendant (3)

Counsel for the claimant (2)

Counsel for the young independent counsel (1)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →