YFF v YFG & Anor
Featured in the weekly digest — week of 22–28 June 2026 →
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Chan Seng Onn |
| Charges / claim | Land, Injunctions |
| Counsel | A P Law Practice LLC, BR Law Corporation, Covenant Chambers LLC, Drew & Napier LLC, Ravus Law Chambers LLC, Benaiah Lim Oon Kuan, Chia Huai Yuan (Xie Huaiyuan), Darren Jeevan Jose Charles, Dillion Chua Hong Bin, Fong Chee Yang, Gerui Lim, Jason Yan Zixiang, Lau Chung Kit Darryl, Lee Ee Yang, Ponnampalam Sivakumar, Praveen Prathap, Sarah Nadia Binte Sazali |
Source: [2026] SGHCF 20, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (17)
Case Significance
In YFF v YFG & Anor ([2026] SGHCF 20), Chan Seng Onn SJ of the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) delivered judgment on 26 June 2026 in Originating Claim No 10 of 2025, concerning Summonses Nos 91 and 93 of 2026. The claimant, YFF, is the lawful widow of the deceased and had obtained an interim injunction on 1 December 2025 (HCF/ORC 365/2025) against executors YFG and YFH over a Siglap Road property forming part of the estate; the present applications, brought respectively by a third-party purchaser who held an option to purchase the property and the bank that lent the purchaser mortgage financing, sought to vary that injunction in connection with the purchaser's registration of title and the bank's related interests. Heard on 6 and 14 May 2026, the judgment addresses caveats and the purposes for granting injunctions, citing 9 Singapore authorities and the Land Titles Act.
[2026] SGHCF 20 explained
YFF v YFG & Anor ([2026] SGHCF 20) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 26 June 2026. It is categorised under Land and Injunctions. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHCF 20 about?
YFF v YFG & Anor ([2026] SGHCF 20) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Land — Caveats” and “Injunctions — Purposes for grant”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHCF 20 consider?
The judgment refers to Land Titles Act (Cap 157). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHCF 20 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2026] SGHCR 7. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Why did a purchaser and a bank apply to vary the injunction in YFF v YFG & Anor ([2026] SGHCF 20)?
In Originating Claim No 10 of 2025, the purchaser holding an option on the deceased's Siglap Road property, and the bank financing that purchase, applied in Summonses 91 and 93 of 2026 to vary a 1 December 2025 injunction obtained by widow-claimant YFF against executors YFG and YFH.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (9)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCF 20)