XIANG DA MARINE PTE. LTD. (IN CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION) & ANOR V ZHANG XIANMING & 4 ORS

[2023] SGHCR 15 High Court Registrar 7 September 2023 HC/OC 194/2023 ( HC/SUM 1967/2023,HC/SUM 1965/2023 )
17 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court Registrar
Decided
Judge Perry Peh
Charges / claim Civil Procedure, Insolvency Law
Counsel Alcove Law LLC, Helmsman LLC, Anthony Soh, Huang Peide, Iris Ng, Una Khng

Source: [2023] SGHCR 15, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Alcove Law LLC Firm
Helmsman LLC Firm
Anthony Soh Counsel for the claimant
Huang Peide Counsel for the defendant
Iris Ng Counsel for the defendant
Una Khng Counsel for the defendant

Parties (7)

Fu Ning Marine Pte Ltd Defendant
Ji Ning Marine Pte Ltd Defendant
Qing Ning Marine Pte Ltd Defendant
Xiang Da Marine Pte Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) Claimant
Farooq Ahmad Mann Claimant
Wu Jianshi Defendant
Zhang Xianming Defendant

Case Significance

Xiang Da Marine Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and another v Zhang Xianming and others [2023] SGHCR 15 is a reserved judgment of AR Perry Peh in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 7 September 2023 in Originating Claim No 194 of 2023 (Summonses Nos 1965 and 1967 of 2023). The claimants, Xiang Da Marine Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and its liquidator Farooq Ahmad Mann, alleged that assets transferred to the third to fifth defendants, Fu Ning Marine, Ji Ning Marine and Qing Ning Marine Pte Ltd, were transactions at an undervalue under s 98(3)(a) and/or s 98(3)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. By SUM 1965, those defendants applied to strike out the claims under O 9 r 16 of the Rules of Court 2021, with SUM 1967 sought in the alternative; the judgment addresses the striking-out application.

Summary

The liquidator of Xiang Da Marine Pte Ltd, a ship-management company in creditors' voluntary liquidation, sued to recover assets transferred to three related companies, alleging transactions at an undervalue under the Bankruptcy Act read with the Companies Act. Those defendants applied to strike out the claims and, alternatively, for security for costs. The Assistant Registrar examined whether the statement of claim disclosed a reasonable cause of action, finding no material facts pleaded to support a breach of duty independent of the undervalue allegation.

What was Xiang Da Marine v Zhang Xianming [2023] SGHCR 15 about?

It was a striking-out application by the third to fifth defendants before AR Perry Peh, in a claim by Xiang Da Marine Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and liquidator Farooq Ahmad Mann alleging transactions at an undervalue, decided on 7 September 2023.

What was the legal basis for the claims in [2023] SGHCR 15?

The claimants alleged the first claimant's asset transfers to Fu Ning, Ji Ning and Qing Ning Marine Pte Ltd were transactions at an undervalue under s 98(3)(a) and/or s 98(3)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (17)

SG (5)
[2011] SGHC 228 [2017] SGHC 15 [2019] SGHC 228 [2022] SGHC 225 [2023] SGHC 160
SLR (12)
[1997] 3 SLR(R) 649 [2003] 4 SLR(R) 667 [2004] 1 SLR(R) 434 [2005] 1 SLR(R) 154 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 817 [2012] 4 SLR 546 [2015] 1 SLR 875 [2015] 5 SLR 1422 [2016] 2 SLR 1178 [2017] 3 SLR 559 [2022] 2 SLR 1018 [2022] 2 SLR 158

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCR 15)