This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Jonathan Tan. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Jonathan Tan appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGCA.

These cases are classified under Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Companies, and Jonathan Tan acted for the respondent in 2 and the defendant in 1.

Reported cases
5
Courts
SGCA, SGHC, SGHC(I)
Period
March 2023 to September 2026

Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Jonathan Tan — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Jonathan Tan appeared

Counsel for the respondent
2 cases
Counsel for the defendant
1 case
Counsel for the prosecution
1 case
Counsel for the appellant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
1
Sentence imposed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 5 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 38 Appeal dismissed

“We therefore dismiss the appeal against conviction and sentence.”

CHJ v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent
[2024] SGHC 240 Sentence imposed

“I sentenced the Accused to seven years’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane for each of the SAP Charge, and 12 months’ imprisonment for the Obstruction Charge.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CHJ · SGHC · · Counsel for the prosecution

Parties in these cases

CHJ2 Soneva Holdings Pte Ltd1 Steele SVA Holdings, LLC1 SH (BVI) Ltd1 Rizuwan bin Rohmat1 Chang Peng Hong Clarence1

What areas of law does Jonathan Tan practice?

Criminal Law 4 cases

Reported between March 2023 and August 2025.

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 2 cases

Reported between September 2024 and August 2025.

5
Appearances
4
Roles
3
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Counsel for the respondent (2)

Counsel for the prosecution (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →