W. POWER GROUP EOOD v MINGYANG WIND POWER (INTERNATIONAL) CO. LTD
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Thomas Bathurst |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Allen & Gledhill LLP, CTLC Law Corporation, Han Wah Teng, Ivan Lim Jun Rui, William Ong Boon Hwee, Wong Pei Ting |
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 20, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
W Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co Ltd [2023] SGHC(I) 20 is a judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court by Thomas Bathurst IJ, delivered on 10 November 2023 in Originating Application No 2 of 2023 (Summons No 13 of 2023). It followed an earlier judgment ([2023] SGHC(I) 15) in which the claimant had been ordered to provide security for the defendant's costs up to the commencement of trial in the amount of $70,000, to be provided by 6 October 2023. The claimant failed to provide the security and did not seek an extension, and the judgment addressed the quantum of costs for the security application and non-compliance with the rules of court.
[2023] SGHC(I) 20 explained
W. POWER GROUP EOOD v MINGYANG WIND POWER (INTERNATIONAL) CO. LTD ([2023] SGHC(I) 20) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 10 November 2023. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC(I) 20 about?
W. POWER GROUP EOOD v MINGYANG WIND POWER (INTERNATIONAL) CO. LTD ([2023] SGHC(I) 20) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Rules of court — Non-compliance” and “Civil Procedure — Costs — Quantum of costs for application for security”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC(I) 20 consider?
The judgment refers to Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGHC(I) 20 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGCA(I) 8 and [2023] SGHC(I) 15. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What did W Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power [2023] SGHC(I) 20 concern?
Decided by Thomas Bathurst IJ in the Singapore International Commercial Court, it concerned the quantum of costs for a security-for-costs application and non-compliance, after the claimant failed to provide the $70,000 security ordered by 6 October 2023.
How much security for costs was ordered in the W Power Group case ([2023] SGHC(I) 20)?
The claimant, W. Power Group EOOD, was ordered to provide $70,000 as security for the defendant Ming Yang Wind Power's costs up to the commencement of trial by 6 October 2023, but failed to do so and did not seek an extension of time.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 20)