JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors

[2026] SGHC 27 High Court (General Division) 4 February 2026 • HC/OC 28/2025 ( HC/SUM 3300/2025 ) • 20 min read
7 cases cited (5 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Bankruptcy effects Civil Procedure — Amendments — Orders — Election of remedies Insolvency Law — Avoidance of transactions — Dispositions of property after commencement of insolvency proceedings

Practice Areas

Insolvency Law Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Aidan Xu Delivered

Counsel (12)

Allen & Gledhill LLP Firm Clasis LLC Firm Ee Jia Min Counsel Applicant Izzat Rashad Bin Rosazizi Counsel Applicant Koh Junxiang Counsel Defendant Ng Pi Wei Counsel Defendant Prakash Pillai Counsel Defendant Richard Xu Hanqi Counsel Applicant Tan Yen Jee Counsel Applicant Tay Zhuo Yan Isaac Counsel Defendant Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong Counsel Applicant Yeoh Tze Ning Counsel Applicant

Parties (7)

Intentio Management Company Limited Defendant Metro Capital Limited Defendant Deepak Mishra Defendant Hamish Alexander Christie Applicant Jason Aleksander Kardachi Applicant Nimisha Pandey Defendant Rajesh Bothra Third Party

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 27 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 4 February 2026 concerning Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy, amendments, and avoidance of transactions. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu. The case was brought by Hamish Alexander Christie and others (applicant) against Intentio Management Company Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases (5 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Summary

Jason Kardachi and another party sued Deepak Mishra and others in a commercial dispute involving breach of contract and conspiracy. The court addressed the claims of contractual breach, fiduciary duties, and the liability of multiple defendants.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 27?

[2026] SGHC 27 (JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 4 February 2026 addressing Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy, amendments, and avoidance of transactions. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu.

Who were the parties in JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors?

The applicant in [2026] SGHC 27 was Hamish Alexander Christie, Jason Aleksander Kardachi, and the respondent was Intentio Management Company Limited, Metro Capital Limited. Legal representation included Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The case was decided on 4 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 27?

[2026] SGHC 27 was delivered by Aidan Xu in the High Court (General Division) on 4 February 2026. The case concerned Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 27 cite?

[2026] SGHC 27 cites 7 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Insolvency Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

Statutes Cited

Insolvency Act
s 284
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
Restructuring and Dissolution Act

Cases Cited (7)

SG (1)
[2025] SGHC 218
SLR (4)
[2004] 4 SLR(R) 411 [2010] 1 SLR 189 [2018] 4 SLR 1260 [2020] 1 SLR 763
UK (2)
[1996] 1 AC 514 [2018] EWCA Civ 519

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 27)