JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors

Q: Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 27 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2026] SGHC 27 High Court (General Division) 4 February 2026 HC/OC 28/2025 ( HC/SUM 3300/2025 ) 20 min read

7 cases cited (5 SG, 2 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	4 February 2026
Judge	Aidan Xu
Charges / claim	Insolvency Law, Civil Procedure
Counsel	Allen & Gledhill LLP, Clasis LLC, Ee Jia Min, Izzat Rashad Bin Rosazizi, Koh Junxiang, Ng Pi Wei, Prakash Pillai, Richard Xu Hanqi, Tan Yen Jee, Tay Zhuo Yan Isaac, Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong, Yeoh Tze Ning

Source: [2026] SGHC 27, High Court (General Division), decided 4 February 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Bankruptcy effects Civil Procedure — Amendments — Orders — Election of remedies Insolvency Law — Avoidance of transactions — Dispositions of property after commencement of insolvency proceedings

Practice Areas

Insolvency Law Civil Procedure

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 27 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 4 February 2026 concerning Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy, amendments, and avoidance of transactions. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu. The case was brought by Hamish Alexander Christie and others (applicant) against Intentio Management Company Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases (5 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

[2026] SGHC 27 explained

JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2026] SGHC 27) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 4 February 2026. It is categorised under Insolvency Law and Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC 27 about?

JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2026] SGHC 27) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Bankruptcy effects”, “Civil Procedure — Amendments — Orders — Election of remedies”, and “Insolvency Law — Avoidance of transactions — Dispositions of property after commencement of insolvency proceedings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 27 consider?

The judgment refers to Insolvency Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 27 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 218. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

How influential is [2026] SGHC 27?

Within this corpus, [2026] SGHC 27 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

Jason Kardachi and another party sued Deepak Mishra and others in a commercial dispute involving breach of contract and conspiracy. The court addressed the claims of contractual breach, fiduciary duties, and the liability of multiple defendants.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 27?

[2026] SGHC 27 (JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 4 February 2026 addressing Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy, amendments, and avoidance of transactions. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu.

Who were the parties in JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2026] SGHC 27)?

The applicant in [2026] SGHC 27 was Hamish Alexander Christie, Jason Aleksander Kardachi, and the respondent was Intentio Management Company Limited, Metro Capital Limited. Legal representation included Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The case was decided on 4 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 27?

[2026] SGHC 27 was delivered by Aidan Xu in the High Court (General Division) on 4 February 2026. The case concerned Civil Procedure and Insolvency Law.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 27 cite?

[2026] SGHC 27 cites 7 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Insolvency Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.