Yeoh Tze Ning
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Yeoh Tze Ning. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Yeoh Tze Ning appears as counsel of record in 11 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Insolvency Law, Civil Procedure and Companies, and Yeoh Tze Ning acted for the applicant in 7 and the defendant in 2.
- Reported cases
- 11
- Courts
- High Court, High Court Registrar
- Period
- February 2023 to August 2026
Source: derived from 11 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Yeoh Tze Ning — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Yeoh Tze Ning appeared
- Counsel for the applicant
- 7 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the non-party
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application granted
- 2
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 11 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“Zhuang was granted leave to commence proceedings in the name and on behalf of the Companies against Huang in respect of his alleged “breaches of fiduciary and other duties owed by Huang to the [Companies] arising out of or in connection with Huang’s position as a director, [CEO] and/or employee” of the Companies.”
High Court · 15 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 127 · Counsel for the applicant · Application granted -
“I dismissed both applications.”
High Court · 25 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 271 · Counsel for the non-party · Application dismissed -
“I granted the application in its entirety, which would include the extension of the moratoria until three weeks after the scheme meeting is held.”
High Court · 24 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 329 · Counsel for the applicant · Application granted
What areas of law does Yeoh Tze Ning practice?
Insolvency Law 6 cases
Reported between April 2023 and August 2026.
Civil Procedure 3 cases
Reported between May 2023 and April 2026.
Counsel for the third party (1)
-
The court made the bankruptcy orders and ordered that the A&M Nominees be appointed as joint and several private trustees of both debtors' bankruptcy estates.
High Court Registrar · 14 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 33
Counsel for the applicant (7)
-
The High Court allowed OA 183 on 4 March 2026, granting Zhuang permission to bring proceedings in the companies' names against Huang for breaches of fiduciary and other duties and giving him full…
High Court · 15 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 127 -
Aidan Xu J allowed the amended prayers in part, by way of a fresh oral application rather than an amendment of SUM 3300.
High Court · 30 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 91 -
The court refused the application, making no orders on any of the three prayers in HC/SUM 3300/2025.
High Court · 4 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 27 -
The High Court allowed the trustees' application in OA 672, declaring that Mr Mishra did not have the leave of court needed to commence the arbitration and restraining him from pursuing it against…
High Court · 4 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 218 -
The court granted the application in its entirety, including an extension of the moratoria until three weeks after the scheme meeting is held, with liberty to apply in respect of that extension.
High Court · 24 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 329 -
The High Court granted the applications, recognising GAP's appointment as the foreign representative of each of the three companies, subject to a reporting requirement.
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 240 -
Aedit Abdullah J allowed the sealing applications and granted the moratoria extensions in part, for about three months rather than the six months sought, so that the court could keep the matter under…
High Court · 17 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 98
Counsel for the non-party (1)
-
The court dismissed both applications.
High Court · 25 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 271
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The court granted the Mareva injunction against Mr Wang but limited it to US$2.5m, half the sum claimed, with Parastate's undertaking fortified by a payment of S$50,000 into court, the prescribed…
High Court · 26 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 153 -
The court held that no prior approval was needed and granted Mr Wang's application, staying the rest of the action pending resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
High Court · 28 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 48