JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah |
| Charges / claim | Insolvency Law |
| Counsel | Allen & Gledhill LLP, Clasis LLC, Ee Jia Min, Izzat Rashad Bin Rosazizi, Koh Junxiang, Ng Pi Wei, Prakash Pillai, Richard Xu Hanqi, Tan Yen Jee, Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong, Yeoh Tze Ning |
Source: [2025] SGHC 218, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (11)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 218 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 4 November 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah. The case was brought by Hamish Alexander Christie and others (applicant) against Intentio Management Company Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The judgment cites 11 cases and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Act, the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, and the Insolvency. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 218 explained
JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 218) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 4 November 2025. It is categorised under Insolvency Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 218 about?
JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 218) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Trustee in bankruptcy”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 218 consider?
The judgment refers to Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20), Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61), Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 218?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 218 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
The private trustees in bankruptcy of Rajesh Bothra sought declarations that Deepak Mishra lacked leave to commence SIAC arbitration against them, and Mishra sought retrospective leave or a stay of related proceedings. The court held that leave was required to commence arbitration against trustees in bankruptcy and could be granted retrospectively, but declined to grant retrospective leave on the facts, dismissing Mishra's applications.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 218?
[2025] SGHC 218 (JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 4 November 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah.
Who were the parties in JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors ([2025] SGHC 218)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 218 was Hamish Alexander Christie, Jason Aleksander Kardachi, and the respondent was Intentio Management Company Limited, Metro Capital Limited. Legal representation included Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The case was decided on 4 November 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 218?
[2025] SGHC 218 was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah in the High Court (General Division) on 4 November 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 218 cite?
[2025] SGHC 218 cites 11 prior decisions. It references Bankruptcy Act, Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, Insolvency. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 218)