JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors

[2025] SGHC 218 High Court (General Division) 4 November 2025 • HC/OC 28/2025 ( HC/SUM 1849/2025 ) |HC/OA 672/2025 ( HC/SUM 1971/2025 ) • 27 min read
11 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Trustee in bankruptcy

Practice Areas

Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah Delivered

Counsel (11)

Allen & Gledhill LLP Firm Clasis LLC Firm Ee Jia Min Counsel Applicant Izzat Rashad Bin Rosazizi Counsel Applicant Koh Junxiang Counsel Respondent Ng Pi Wei Counsel Respondent Prakash Pillai Counsel Respondent Richard Xu Hanqi Counsel Applicant Tan Yen Jee Counsel Applicant Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong Counsel Applicant Yeoh Tze Ning Counsel Applicant

Parties (7)

Intentio Management Company Limited Defendant Metro Capital Limited Defendant Deepak Mishra Respondent Hamish Alexander Christie Applicant Jason Aleksander Kardachi Applicant Nimisha Pandey Defendant Rajesh Bothra Third Party

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 218 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 4 November 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah. The case was brought by Hamish Alexander Christie and others (applicant) against Intentio Management Company Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The judgment cites 11 cases and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Act, the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, and the Insolvency. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.

Summary

The private trustees in bankruptcy of Rajesh Bothra sought declarations that Deepak Mishra lacked leave to commence SIAC arbitration against them, and Mishra sought retrospective leave or a stay of related proceedings. The court held that leave was required to commence arbitration against trustees in bankruptcy and could be granted retrospectively, but declined to grant retrospective leave on the facts, dismissing Mishra's applications.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 218?

[2025] SGHC 218 (JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 4 November 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah.

Who were the parties in JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors?

The applicant in [2025] SGHC 218 was Hamish Alexander Christie, Jason Aleksander Kardachi, and the respondent was Intentio Management Company Limited, Metro Capital Limited. Legal representation included Allen & Gledhill LLP and Clasis LLC. The case was decided on 4 November 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 218?

[2025] SGHC 218 was delivered by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah in the High Court (General Division) on 4 November 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 218 cite?

[2025] SGHC 218 cites 11 prior decisions. It references Bankruptcy Act, Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, Insolvency. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.

Statutes Cited

Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20)
s 98
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61)
s 73B
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
Restructuring and Dissolution Act

Cases Cited (11)

SG (2)
[2005] SGDC 104 [2022] SGHC 271
SLR (9)
[2004] 1 SLR(R) 671 [2006] 1 SLR(R) 358 [2009] 3 SLR(R) 518 [2011] 3 SLR 414 [2012] 2 SLR 999 [2015] 3 SLR 695 [2016] 1 SLR 373 [2020] 1 SLR 1296 [2021] 1 SLR 1248

Cited By (1)

[2026] SGHC 27
JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 218)