Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Contract and Civil Procedure, and Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman acted for the plaintiff in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court, Singapore International Commercial Court, High Court (Appellate Division)
- Period
- March 2024 to October 2026
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the Law Society of Singapore
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed in part
- 1
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“For the foregoing reasons, we allow the appeal in respect of Tuffi’s claim against Techkon, and dismiss the appeal in respect of Tuffi’s claim against TDSPL.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 8 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 25 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed in part -
“The application is dismissed, whereby the Ruan set aside order is unconditional.”
Singapore International Commercial Court · 28 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 15 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman practice?
Contract 2 cases
Reported between October 2025 and October 2026.
Civil Procedure 2 cases
Reported between March 2024 and May 2024.
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part: it allowed Tuffi's claim against Techkon, rectifying the 2019 agreement so that the adjusted final sum was $1,452,962.89 and ordering Techkon to pay…
High Court (Appellate Division) · 8 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 25
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed Tuffi's claims entirely and said it would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 14 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 201
Counsel for the Law Society of Singapore (1)
-
The court allowed the Attorney-General's application and ordered that Ms Phua be struck off the roll, with a minimum reinstatement interval of two years and six months, subject to the usual…
High Court · 20 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 214
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
Roger Giles IJ dismissed Kiri's application, so the order setting aside the service out order as regards Mr Ruan became unconditional.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 28 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 15 -
Roger Giles IJ allowed the application in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 27 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 7