TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Dedar Singh Gill |
| Charges / claim | Intellectual Property |
| Counsel | Allen & Gledhill LLP, Eldan Law LLP, Toh Jia Yi, Wong Siew Hong |
Source: [2023] SGHC 138, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Tiger Pictures Entertainment Ltd v Encore Films Pte Ltd [2023] SGHC 138 is the grounds of decision of Dedar Singh Gill J in the General Division of the High Court, delivered on 15 May 2023 in Originating Claim No 466 of 2022 (Summons No 926 of 2023). The defendant, Encore Films Pte Ltd, applied by SUM 926 for an order that the simplified process under Part 2 of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Intellectual Property) Rules 2022 not apply to the copyright claim brought by Tiger Pictures Entertainment Ltd, a company incorporated in the People's Republic of China. Dedar Singh Gill J dismissed the application on 21 April 2023, providing full grounds as this was the first case to invoke the simplified process.
[2023] SGHC 138 explained
TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD ([2023] SGHC 138) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 15 May 2023. It is categorised under Intellectual Property. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC 138 about?
TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD ([2023] SGHC 138) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Intellectual Property — Copyright — Simplified process”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC 138 consider?
The judgment refers to Copyright Act (Cap 63). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2023] SGHC 138?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC 138 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What did the court decide in Tiger Pictures Entertainment Ltd v Encore Films Pte Ltd [2023] SGHC 138?
Dedar Singh Gill J dismissed Encore Films Pte Ltd's application (Summons No 926 of 2023) for an order that the simplified process under the Supreme Court of Judicature (Intellectual Property) Rules 2022 not apply to Tiger Pictures' copyright claim, on 21 April 2023.
Why is [2023] SGHC 138 significant for the intellectual property simplified process?
It was the first case to invoke the simplified process under Part 2 of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Intellectual Property) Rules 2022, prompting Dedar Singh Gill J to provide full grounds explaining his decision to dismiss the application.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC 138)