CKR Paints & Coating Specialist Pte. Ltd.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Philip Jeyaretnam |
| Charges / claim | Companies |
| Counsel | Advent Law Corporation, Allen & Gledhill LLP, Carinhill Law LLC, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, Shook Lin & Bok LLP, Ashok Kumar Rai, Chia Su Min Rebecca, Jo Tay Yu Xi, Koh Kia Jeng, Lim Jie Hao Sampson, Ng Huan Yong, Ng Yeow Khoon, Peh Aik Hin, Tan Bee Yong, Tan Yen Jee, Teo Hui Xian Astrid, Toh Cher Han |
Source: [2025] SGHC 120, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (17)
Parties (7)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 120 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 1 July 2025 concerning Companies, specifically addressing schemes of arrangement. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam. Legal representation was provided by Carinhill Law LLC. The judgment cites 5 cases (4 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Companies Act.
[2025] SGHC 120 explained
CKR Paints & Coating Specialist Pte. Ltd. ([2025] SGHC 120) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. It is categorised under Companies. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 120 about?
CKR Paints & Coating Specialist Pte. Ltd. ([2025] SGHC 120) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Companies — Schemes of arrangement — Leave to convene creditors’ meeting — Section 210(1) Companies Act 1967 (2020 Rev Ed)”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 120 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 120 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 115. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
CKR Paints applied for leave to convene a creditors' meeting for a proposed scheme of arrangement offering creditors a one-time payment of S$2.44 million in full discharge of its debts. The court dismissed the application, finding no realistic prospect of the scheme being approved as three major creditors (Maybank, UOB, and DBS) holding at least 75% of the debt had consistently opposed the proposal.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 120?
[2025] SGHC 120 (CKR Paints & Coating Specialist Pte. Ltd.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 1 July 2025 addressing Companies, specifically schemes of arrangement. The judgment was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 120?
[2025] SGHC 120 was delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam in the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. The case concerned Companies.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 120 cite?
[2025] SGHC 120 cites 5 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Companies Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 120)