ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Hri Kumar Nair |
| Charges / claim | Companies |
| Counsel | Providence Law Asia LLC, Rev Law LLC, Alston Yeong, Chua Sui Tong, Huang Xinli Daniel, Lau Hui Ming Kenny, Ng Tse Jun Russell, Vergis S Abraham, Wong Wan Chee |
Source: [2025] SGHC 77, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (9)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 77 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 April 2025 concerning Companies, specifically addressing schemes of arrangement and receiver and manager. The judgment was delivered by Hri Kumar Nair. The case was brought by ArcelorMittal Holdings AG (applicant) against Liberty House Group Pte Ltd (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Rev Law LLC and Providence Law Asia LLC. The judgment cites 12 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Companies Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
[2025] SGHC 77 explained
ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 77) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 28 April 2025. It is categorised under Companies. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 77 about?
ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 77) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Companies — Schemes of arrangement — Moratorium order” and “Companies — Receiver and manager — Judicial management order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 77 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 77 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 6, [2024] SGHC 328, and [2024] SGHC 312. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 77?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 77 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
ArcelorMittal applied to place Liberty House Group Pte Ltd in judicial management due to the company's financial difficulties following the collapse of Greensill Capital. The court granted the judicial management order, rejecting the company's alternative application for a four-month moratorium to propose a scheme of arrangement, finding the proposed scheme lacked transparency and creditor confidence.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 77?
[2025] SGHC 77 (ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 April 2025 addressing Companies, specifically schemes of arrangement and receiver and manager. The judgment was delivered by Hri Kumar Nair.
Who were the parties in ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 77)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 77 was ArcelorMittal Holdings AG, and the respondent was Liberty House Group Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Providence Law Asia LLC and Rev Law LLC. The case was decided on 28 April 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 77?
[2025] SGHC 77 was delivered by Hri Kumar Nair in the High Court (General Division) on 28 April 2025. The case concerned Companies.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 77 cite?
[2025] SGHC 77 cites 12 prior decisions. It references Companies Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (12)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 77)