Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP appears in 77 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Arbitration and Contract, and Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP acted for the defendant in 20 and the respondent in 17.
- Reported cases
- 77
- Courts
- SGHC, SGHC(A), SGHC(I), SGHCR, SGCA, SGHCF, SGFC, SGDC, SGMC, SGCA(I)
- Period
- January 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 77 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 20 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 17 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 11 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 9 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 6 cases
- Counsel for the third party
- 5 cases
- Counsel for the claimant
- 4 cases
- Counsel for the Yi Sheng Foundation Pte Ltd
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicants
- 1 case
- Counsel for the creditor
- 1 case
- Counsel for the young independent counsel
- 1 case
- Counsel for the first defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 7
- Appeal dismissed
- 7
- Claim dismissed
- 2
- Appeal allowed in part
- 2
- Claim allowed
- 1
- Claim allowed in part
- 1
- Application allowed
- 1
Disposition recorded in 21 of 77 cases.
What the courts decided
“I dismissed the application in MSS 1638/2025.”
“I allow the claim based on the Defendant’s breach of contract and enter judgment for the Claimant for the sum of $164,154.”
“I therefore dismiss the claim against both Defendants as the Claimant has failed to prove that they were responsible for publishing the Statements.”
“…the application is dismissed.”
“…we dismissed the application with costs fixed at $10,000 (all-in) to be paid by POP to the respondents.”
“…we partially allowed the appeals in AD 72 and AD 73.”
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP specialize in?
Civil Procedure 24 cases
Reported between February 2023 and May 2026.
Arbitration 14 cases
Reported between March 2023 and September 2026.
Contract 13 cases
Reported between February 2023 and May 2026.
Counsel named in these judgments (104)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (77)
In the court record
The reported judgments Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.
- In Civil Procedure Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Arbitration Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Contract Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Companies Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Insolvency Law Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Tort Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.