DBO & 3 Ors v DBP & 4 Ors

[2024] SGCA(I) 4 Court of Appeal (International) 24 June 2024 CA/CAS 9/2023 20 min read
1 cases cited

Key facts

Court Court of Appeal (International)
Decided
Judges David Neuberger, Steven Chong, Sundaresh Menon
Charges / claim Arbitration
Counsel Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, Linklaters Singapore Pte Ltd, Providence Law Asia LLC, Setia Law LLC, Bethel Chan Ruiyi, Hannah Chua, Jelita Pandjaitan, Junjie Huang, Ong Tun Wei Danny, Reuben Gavin Peter, Tan Mazie, Zhulkarnain Bin Abdul Rahim, Zhuo Jiaxiang

Source: [2024] SGCA(I) 4, Court of Appeal (International), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (13)

Parties (9)

Case Significance

DBO and others v DBP and others [2024] SGCA(I) 4 was a decision of the Court of Appeal delivered by David Neuberger IJ, sitting with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Steven Chong JCA, in Civil Appeal No 9 of 2023. At the close of oral argument on 25 March 2024 the Chief Justice announced that the appeal would be dismissed, with reasons given on 24 June 2024. The appeal challenged a decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court (DBO and others v DBP and others [2023] SGHC(I) 21) which had dismissed the appellants' application to set aside a Partial Arbitration Award dated 30 January 2023, by which an arbitral tribunal had dismissed a claim brought under Rule 29.1 of the Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.

As set out in the judgment, the underlying dispute arose from a Facility Agreement made on 26 February 2020 under which the lenders (DBR, DBT and DBV) granted a loan facility of US$200m to the borrowers (DBO and DBQ), with DBP as the Security Agent. The appellants were represented by counsel from Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, including Zhulkarnain Bin Abdul Rahim, while the respondents were represented by counsel from Setia Law LLC, Providence Law Asia LLC and Linklaters Singapore Pte Ltd.

[2024] SGCA(I) 4 explained

DBO & 3 Ors v DBP & 4 Ors ([2024] SGCA(I) 4) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal (International) on 24 June 2024. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGCA(I) 4 about?

DBO & 3 Ors v DBP & 4 Ors ([2024] SGCA(I) 4) is a Court of Appeal (International) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGCA(I) 4 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What was the outcome of DBO v DBP [2024] SGCA(I) 4?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. David Neuberger IJ, sitting with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Steven Chong JCA, upheld the Singapore International Commercial Court's refusal to set aside a Partial Arbitration Award dated 30 January 2023, with reasons issued on 24 June 2024.

What was the underlying dispute in [2024] SGCA(I) 4?

The dispute arose from a Facility Agreement made on 26 February 2020 under which lenders granted a US$200m loan facility to the borrowers. The appellants had unsuccessfully applied to set aside a SIAC arbitral tribunal's award dismissing their claim under Rule 29.1 of the SIAC Rules.

Which court and judges decided DBO v DBP [2024] SGCA(I) 4?

It was decided by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No 9 of 2023, with the grounds of decision delivered by David Neuberger IJ on behalf of the court, sitting with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Steven Chong JCA. The appeal was dismissed on 24 June 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA(I) 4)