T

Tan Mazie

Setia Law LLC · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 2021 7 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Tan Mazie. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Tan Mazie appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Arbitration and Companies, and Tan Mazie acted for the defendant in 4 and the plaintiff in 2.

Reported cases
7
Courts
SGHC, SGHCR, SGCA(I)
Period
November 2023 to August 2026

Source: derived from 7 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Tan Mazie — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Tan Mazie appeared

Counsel for the defendant
4 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
2 cases
Counsel for the respondent
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Application allowed
1
Application dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 7 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGHCR 28 Application allowed

“I allowed the application.”

ALEKSANDR VIKTOROVICH PROSETSKII V COURTWELL ASIA LIMITED & 6 ORS · SGHCR · · Counsel for the defendant
[2025] SGHCR 25 Application dismissed

“I dismissed the applications and found no reason to set aside the Service Out Order.”

ALEKSANDR VIKTOROVICH PROSETSKII v IGOR SMIRNOV & 2 Ors · SGHCR · · Counsel for the defendant

Parties in these cases

Seasreno Marine Ltd3 Infinite Tide Corp.3 Igor Smirnov3 Aleksandr Viktorovich Prosetskii3 Ivan Obukhov2 Ludmila Babuschin2 Viktor Sergeevich Baransky2 Courtwell Asia Limited1

What areas of law does Tan Mazie practice?

Civil Procedure 5 cases

Reported between November 2023 and August 2026.

Arbitration 2 cases

Reported between November 2023 and June 2024.

7
Appearances
2021
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (4)

Counsel for the plaintiff (2)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →