L

Low Chai Chong

Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 1987 8 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Low Chai Chong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Low Chai Chong appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Damages, Trusts and Intellectual Property, and Low Chai Chong acted for the applicant in 3 and the plaintiff in 2.

Reported cases
8
Courts
SGHC, SGCA, SGHC(A)
Period
April 2023 to October 2025

Source: derived from 8 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Low Chai Chong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Low Chai Chong appeared

Counsel for the applicant
3 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
2 cases
Counsel for the respondent
1 case
Counsel for the appellant
1 case
Counsel for the defendant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Application dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 1 of 8 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 51 Application dismissed

“…we dismissed the application with costs fixed at $10,000 (all-in) to be paid by POP to the respondents.”

POP HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v Teo Ban Lim & 3 Ors · SGCA · · Counsel for the applicant

Parties in these cases

TOWA Corporation3 Metech International Limited2 X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd2 ASMPT Limited2 ASMPT Singapore Pte Ltd2 ASM Pacific Technology Limited1 ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd1 Lim Hwee Hoon1

What areas of law does Low Chai Chong practice?

Damages 3 cases

Reported between April 2023 and November 2024.

Trusts 2 cases

Reported between May 2024 and September 2025.

8
Appearances
1987
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the applicant (3)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Counsel for the plaintiff (2)

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →