Mok Zi Cong
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Mok Zi Cong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Mok Zi Cong appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court (Appellate Division).
These cases span several subject areas, most often Gifts, Civil Procedure and Tort, and Mok Zi Cong acted for the plaintiff in 3 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 6
- Courts
- High Court (Appellate Division), High Court, District Court, Magistrate Court
- Period
- January 2023 to May 2026
Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Mok Zi Cong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Mok Zi Cong appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 2
- Claim allowed
- 1
- Claim dismissed
- 1
- Claim allowed in part
- 1
Outcome recorded for 5 of the 6 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I allow the claim based on the Defendant’s breach of contract and enter judgment for the Claimant for the sum of $164,154.”
District Court · 5 May 2026 · [2026] SGDC 151 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim allowed -
“I therefore dismiss the claim against both Defendants as the Claimant has failed to prove that they were responsible for publishing the Statements.”
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim dismissed -
“…we dismissed the appeal.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 28 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 24 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“In conclusion, having found that the Transfer was made under a mistake, I ordered the cancellation of the registration of the Transfer as well as the rectification of the land-register to reflect the plaintiff’s continued ownership over the Property.”
High Court · 17 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 326 · Counsel for the defendant · Claim allowed in part -
“We therefore dismiss the appeal.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 6 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 7 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Mok Zi Cong practice?
Gifts 3 cases
Reported between February 2023 and August 2024.
Civil Procedure 3 cases
Reported between February 2023 and August 2024.
Counsel for the plaintiff (3)
-
The District Court allowed the claim for breach of contract and entered judgment for the claimant for $164,154 as liquidated damages under cl 5.
District Court · 5 May 2026 · [2026] SGDC 151 -
The District Judge dismissed the claim against both defendants because the claimant had not proved that either of them was responsible for publishing the statements.
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 -
The court allowed the developer's claim in part, reducing one head, assessing damages at $720,960.84 with interest at 5.33% from the date of the originating summons to judgment.
High Court · 3 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 1
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and ordered the defendants to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $52,000 including disbursements.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 28 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 24
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
Aedit Abdullah J allowed the plaintiff's claim in part.
High Court · 17 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 326
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Appellate Division dismissed both applications to adduce further evidence and dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 6 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 7