AP MEDIA PTE. LTD. v MOTOR IMAGE ENTERPRISES PTE LTD

[2026] SGDC 151 District Court 5 May 2026 • DC/OC 1223/2024 • 33 min read
10 cases cited (9 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

In AP Media Pte Ltd v Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 151, decided on 5 May 2026, District Judge Jonathan Ng Pang Ern of the District Court resolved a contract dispute arising from an uncompleted video advertisement for the Subaru Forester SUV. The claimant, AP Media Pte Ltd (an advertising agency represented by Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP), produced five draft videos using avant-garde technology for the defendant, Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd — the sole Subaru distributor in Singapore — which rejected all five and made no payment. The court addressed issues of contract formation, contractual terms, breach, and liquidated damages.

Summary

AP Media Pte Ltd, an advertising agency, sued Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd, the sole Subaru distributor in Singapore, for breach of contract after Motor Image refused to pay for virtual production work done on a planned Subaru Forester video advertisement, despite having accepted a fee quote on 8 November 2023. The dispute centred on whether a binding contract was formed and whether Motor Image's dissatisfaction with five draft videos entitled it to refuse payment. The District Court allowed the claim, finding a valid contract had been formed and that Motor Image was in repudiatory breach, awarding liquidated damages of $164,154.

What contract issues arose when a Singapore advertiser's video production for Subaru was rejected without payment?

In AP Media Pte Ltd v Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 151, District Judge Jonathan Ng Pang Ern examined whether a binding contract existed between the advertising agency and Subaru's sole Singapore distributor after Motor Image Enterprises rejected all five draft Subaru Forester videos and withheld payment, addressing formation, breach, and liquidated damages.

Cases Cited (10)

SG (1)
[2023] SGHC 294
SLR (8)
[2000] 2 SLR(R) 407 [2004] 3 SLR(R) 316 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 571 [2007] 4 SLR(R) 413 [2007] 4 SLR(R) 855 [2013] 4 SLR 193 [2021] 1 SLR 631 [2022] 2 SLR 23
UK (1)
[1915] AC 75

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 151)