CHAN WAI LEEN, as the Administratrix of the estate of Wong Ching Fong, deceased (NRIC No. SXXXXXXXI), and in her personal capacity & Anor v HO DAT KHOON
Outcome
Appeal dismissedwe dismissed the appeal.
Source: [2024] SGHC(A) 24, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 28 August 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Appellate Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Kannan Ramesh, Philip Jeyaretnam, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Gifts, Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, Loh Eben Ong LLP, UniLegal LLC, Eben Ong Eng Tuan, Mok Zi Cong, Ng Hui Min, Ong Jade Yi, Ranvir Kumar Singh, Shiv Kumar Singh |
Source: [2024] SGHC(A) 24, High Court (Appellate Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (9)
Case Significance
Chan Wai Leen (in her personal capacity and as the administratrix of the estate of Wong Ching Fong, deceased) and another v Ho Dat Khoon [2024] SGHC(A) 24 was decided by the Appellate Division of the High Court of Singapore in Civil Appeal No 57 of 2023, with Woo Bih Li JAD delivering the grounds of decision of the court, sitting with Kannan Ramesh JAD and Philip Jeyaretnam J. The appeal was heard on 7 May 2024 and the grounds were issued on 28 August 2024. It was an appeal against the decision of a judge in the General Division of the High Court in HC/S 1095/2020, the action having been commenced by Mdm Ho Dat Khoon as plaintiff against two defendants: Mdm Chan Wai Leen, sued as administratrix of the estate of her late husband Mr Wong Ching Fong (Alan) and in her personal capacity, and their second daughter Ms Wong Cai Juan.
The parties were related, Mr Wong having been the nephew of the plaintiff, making Mdm Chan the plaintiff's niece-in-law and Ms Wong Cai Juan a grandniece of the plaintiff. In Suit 1095, the plaintiff mainly sought to invalidate the transfer of a property at Emerald Hill Road from her to the second defendant. The catchwords identify the issues as the avoidance of gifts and civil procedure costs, and the matter engaged the Land Titles Act, the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act. The appellants were represented by Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, while Loh Eben Ong LLP and UniLegal LLC acted for the respondent.
[2024] SGHC(A) 24 explained
CHAN WAI LEEN, as the Administratrix of the estate of Wong Ching Fong, deceased (NRIC No. SXXXXXXXI), and in her personal capacity & Anor v HO DAT KHOON ([2024] SGHC(A) 24) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Appellate Division) on 28 August 2024. It is categorised under Gifts and Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC(A) 24 about?
CHAN WAI LEEN, as the Administratrix of the estate of Wong Ching Fong, deceased (NRIC No. SXXXXXXXI), and in her personal capacity & Anor v HO DAT KHOON ([2024] SGHC(A) 24) is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Gifts — Avoidance” and “Civil Procedure — Costs”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC(A) 24 consider?
The judgment refers to Land Titles Act (Cap 157), Legal Profession Act (Cap 161), and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2024] SGHC(A) 24?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC(A) 24 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What was Chan Wai Leen v Ho Dat Khoon [2024] SGHC(A) 24 about?
It was an Appellate Division appeal (Civil Appeal No 57 of 2023) from HC/S 1095/2020, in which Mdm Ho Dat Khoon had sought to invalidate the transfer of a property at Emerald Hill Road to Ms Wong Cai Juan. The catchwords concern avoidance of gifts and civil procedure costs.
Which judges decided Chan Wai Leen v Ho Dat Khoon [2024] SGHC(A) 24?
The Appellate Division of the High Court decided it on 28 August 2024, with Woo Bih Li JAD delivering the grounds of decision of the court, sitting alongside Kannan Ramesh JAD and Philip Jeyaretnam J. The appeal had been heard on 7 May 2024.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (4)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(A) 24)