WDT v WDS
Outcome
Appeal dismissedWe therefore dismiss the appeal.
Source: [2023] SGHC(A) 7, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 6 February 2023. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Appellate Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Debbie Ong Siew Ling, Kannan Ramesh, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Gifts, Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, LVM Law Chambers LLC, Lee Sien Liang Joseph, Mok Zi Cong, Muk Chen Yeen Jonathan, Wah Hsien-Wen Terence, Wong Xiao Wei |
Source: [2023] SGHC(A) 7, High Court (Appellate Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WDT v WDS and other matters [2023] SGHC(A) 7 is an ex tempore judgment of the Appellate Division of the High Court, delivered on 6 February 2023 by Kannan Ramesh JAD (with Woo Bih Li JAD and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD) in Civil Appeal No 55 of 2022 and Summonses Nos 38 and 47 of 2022. The appeal arose from WDS v WDT [2022] SGHCF 12 and concerned an incomplete gift and applications to adduce fresh evidence on appeal. The court dismissed both applications for permission to adduce further evidence (SUM 38 and SUM 47) and also dismissed the appeal. The deceased had four children, all beneficiaries under her will; the appellant, her youngest daughter, had lived with her in Toronto, Canada until the deceased's passing in 2016.
[2023] SGHC(A) 7 explained
WDT v WDS ([2023] SGHC(A) 7) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Appellate Division) on 6 February 2023. It is categorised under Gifts and Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC(A) 7 about?
WDT v WDS ([2023] SGHC(A) 7) is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Gifts — Incomplete” and “Civil Procedure — Appeals — Adducing fresh evidence on appeal”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
In this appeal, the appellant (WDT), the deceased's youngest daughter, sought to establish entitlement to a US$1.5m gift the deceased was said to have intended for her before passing away in 2016. The key issue was whether the gift was complete, given that the donor's intention alone is insufficient and the necessary steps must be taken to effect it. The Appellate Division dismissed the two applications to adduce further evidence and dismissed the appeal, ordering the appellant to pay costs of $25,000 inclusive of disbursements.
What was the outcome in WDT v WDS [2023] SGHC(A) 7?
The Appellate Division of the High Court dismissed both applications to adduce further evidence (Summonses 38 and 47 of 2022) and dismissed the appeal in Civil Appeal No 55 of 2022, in an ex tempore judgment delivered by Kannan Ramesh JAD on 6 February 2023.
What legal issues did WDT v WDS raise ([2023] SGHC(A) 7)?
The case concerned an incomplete gift and the adducing of fresh evidence on appeal. The dispute involved a deceased with four children who were all beneficiaries under her will; the appellant, the youngest daughter, had cared for the deceased in Toronto, Canada until the deceased died in 2016.
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(A) 7)