CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v DENTONS RODYK & DAVIDSON LLP

[2025] SGCA 25 Court of Appeal 11 June 2025 • CA/OA 10/2025 • 35 min read
24 cases cited (20 SG, 4 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (2)

Counsel (7)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

[2025] SGCA 25 is a Court of Appeal decision dated 11 June 2025 concerning Arbitration and Civil Procedure, specifically addressing agreement, appeals, and stay of court proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Sundaresh Menon, with Steven Chong on the coram. The case was brought by Clarence Lun Yaodong (applicant) against Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Fervent Chambers LLC and Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP. The judgment cites 24 cases (20 Singapore, 4 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the International Arbitration Act, and the Legal Profession Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.

Summary

Clarence Lun, a solicitor who had been suspended for 18 months for supervising practice trainees when unqualified, sought permission to appeal the High Court's refusal to stay a bill of costs taxation filed by his former lawyers Dentons Rodyk under s 6 of the Arbitration Act. He argued that a dispute over the validity of his engagement letter should be referred to arbitration before the taxation proceeded. The Court of Appeal refused permission, holding that the dispute resolution clause in the engagement letter expressly excluded disputes concerning the amount or non-payment of bills.

What was decided in [2025] SGCA 25?

[2025] SGCA 25 (CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v DENTONS RODYK & DAVIDSON LLP) is a Court of Appeal decision from 11 June 2025 addressing Arbitration and Civil Procedure, specifically agreement, appeals, and stay of court proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Sundaresh Menon.

Who were the parties in CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v DENTONS RODYK & DAVIDSON LLP?

The applicant in [2025] SGCA 25 was Clarence Lun Yaodong, and the respondent was Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP. Legal representation included Fervent Chambers LLC and Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP. The case was decided on 11 June 2025 in the Court of Appeal.

Which judge decided [2025] SGCA 25?

[2025] SGCA 25 was delivered by Sundaresh Menon in the Court of Appeal on 11 June 2025. Steven Chong also sat on the coram. The case concerned Arbitration and Civil Procedure.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGCA 25 cite?

[2025] SGCA 25 cites 24 prior decisions, including 4 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, International Arbitration Act, Legal Profession Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (24)

SG (2)
[2013] SGHCR 18 [2017] SGHC 210
SLR (18)
[2011] 4 SLR 1184 [2013] 4 SLR 736 [2014] 3 SLR 225 [2015] 5 SLR 722 [2016] 1 SLR 373 [2016] 2 SLR 105 [2019] 2 SLR 682 [2021] 1 SLR 596 [2022] 2 SLR 622 [2022] 3 SLR 585 [2023] 1 SLR 349 [2023] 4 SLR 1599 [2023] 4 SLR 638 [2024] 2 SLR 279 [2024] 2 SLR 516 [2024] 2 SLR 844 [2024] 5 SLR 815 [2024] 6 SLR 653
UK (3)
[1993] Ch 171 [2023] 1 WLR 383 [2024] 1 WLR 4745
HK (1)
[2018] 3 HKC 375

Cited By (1)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGCA 25)