DMC v DMD
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kwek Mean Luck |
| Charges / claim | Contract, Building and Construction Law |
| Counsel | Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, Justicius Law Corporation, Ang Wei Jing, Sheryl, Elizabeth Toh Guek Li, Kirindeep Singh, Lazarus Nicholas Philip, Pang Haoyu, Samuel |
Source: [2025] SGHC 151, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 151 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 6 August 2025 concerning Building and Construction Law and Contract, specifically addressing terms, contractual terms, and statutes and regulations. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck. The case was brought by DMC (plaintiff) against DMD (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP and Justicius Law Corporation. The judgment cites 11 cases (10 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act and the Civil Law Act.
[2025] SGHC 151 explained
DMC v DMD ([2025] SGHC 151) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 August 2025. It is categorised under Contract and Building and Construction Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 151 about?
DMC v DMD ([2025] SGHC 151) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Terms — Liquidated damages clause”, “Contract — Contractual terms — Scope of contractual duties of subcontractor”, and “Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations — Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004 — Waiver by election for inconsistent rights”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 151 consider?
The judgment refers to Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B) and Civil Law Act (Cap 43). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A main contractor for road marking works claimed against its sub-contractor for backcharges and liquidated damages after the sub-contractor allegedly failed to perform a large part of its obligations under two sub-contracts worth approximately $20 million. The court found the sub-contractor breached both sub-contracts and awarded the main contractor backcharges and liquidated damages, while dismissing the sub-contractor's counterclaim for unpaid work.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 151?
[2025] SGHC 151 (DMC v DMD) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 6 August 2025 addressing Building and Construction Law and Contract, specifically terms, contractual terms, and statutes and regulations. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck.
Who were the parties in DMC v DMD ([2025] SGHC 151)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 151 was DMC, and the defendant was DMD. Legal representation included Justicius Law Corporation and Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP. The case was decided on 6 August 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 151?
[2025] SGHC 151 was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck in the High Court (General Division) on 6 August 2025. The case concerned Building and Construction Law and Contract.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 151 cite?
[2025] SGHC 151 cites 11 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act, Civil Law Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 151)