PT. OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS v SUNRISE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Appellate Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Andre Maniam, Kannan Ramesh, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Contract, Courts and Jurisdiction, Civil Procedure, Commercial Transactions |
| Counsel | Advocatus Law LLP, Drew & Napier LLC, Christopher Anand s/o Daniel, Ganga d/o Avadiar, Kirpalani Rakesh Gopal, Lin Jian En Shawn, Oen Weng Yew Timothy, Saadhvika Jayanth, Yeo Yi Ling Eileen |
Source: [2023] SGHC(A) 38, High Court (Appellate Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (9)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills v Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd and another appeal [2023] SGHC(A) 38 is a judgment of the Appellate Division of the High Court delivered by Kannan Ramesh JAD on 24 November 2023, with Woo Bih Li JAD and Andre Maniam J on the coram. The cross-appeals, Civil Appeal Nos 10 and 15 of 2023, were brought by OKI, an Indonesia-incorporated pulp manufacturer, and Sunrise, an India-registered manufacturer of thermosets and lined equipment, against the High Court's decision in Suit No 8 of 2017 (reported at [2023] SGHC 3). The issues spanned sale of goods breach and performance, contractual variation and termination, appeals, and interest on damages. The judgment references the Civil Law Act and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, cites 16 authorities and has been cited twice.
What was PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills v Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd [2023] SGHC(A) 38 about?
It comprised cross-appeals, Civil Appeal Nos 10 and 15 of 2023, from Suit No 8 of 2017 concerning a sale of goods contract between OKI and Sunrise, raising breach, performance, variation, termination and interest issues before the Appellate Division.
Who were the parties in [2023] SGHC(A) 38?
The parties were PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills, an Indonesia-incorporated pulp manufacturer, and Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd, an India-registered manufacturer of thermosets and lined equipment; Kannan Ramesh JAD delivered the Appellate Division's judgment on the cross-appeals.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (16)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(A) 38)