THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v RAVI S/O MADASAMY

[2024] SGHC 141 High Court (General Division) 31 May 2024 C3J/OA 5/2023 · C3J/OA 10/2023 40 min read
18 cases cited

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judges Steven Chong, Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang
Charges / claim Legal Profession
Counsel Allen & Gledhill LLP, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Chua Xinying, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Leong Yi-Ming, Linda Shi Peifeng, Ng Yuan Siang, Ong Boon Hwee William, Seth Yeo Ao-Wen

Source: [2024] SGHC 141, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (9)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy and another matter [2024] SGHC 141 was decided on 31 May 2024 by a Court of 3 Supreme Court Judges, comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Steven Chong JCA, in Originating Applications Nos 5 of 2023 and 10 of 2023, with Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment of the court following a hearing on 9 May 2024. The respondent, Mr Ravi s/o Madasamy, is described as a lawyer of more than 25 years' standing who had been found guilty on more than 10 occasions of improper conduct by the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Law Society of Singapore, with sanctions ranging from monetary penalties to suspensions from practice on two previous occasions. The judgment notes that the respondent was, at the time, serving a five-year suspension that commenced on 21 March 2023. It records that on previous occasions there had been no express finding of dishonesty against him, but that in the two present matters part of the conduct fell to be considered differently. The catchword for the case is "Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Grossly improper conduct". The Law Society of Singapore was represented by Allen & Gledhill LLP and the respondent by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, with Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam among the respondent's counsel.

[2024] SGHC 141 explained

THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v RAVI S/O MADASAMY ([2024] SGHC 141) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 31 May 2024. It is categorised under Legal Profession. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 141 about?

THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v RAVI S/O MADASAMY ([2024] SGHC 141) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Grossly improper conduct”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 141 consider?

The judgment refers to Legal Profession Act (Cap 161). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What was Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2024] SGHC 141 about?

Decided on 31 May 2024 by a Court of 3 Supreme Court Judges, the case concerned disciplinary proceedings against lawyer Ravi s/o Madasamy for grossly improper conduct, in Originating Applications Nos 5 and 10 of 2023, with Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment.

Which judges heard [2024] SGHC 141?

The matter was heard by a Court of 3 Supreme Court Judges comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Steven Chong JCA, with Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment of the court on 31 May 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (18)

SLR (17)
[1999] 1 SLR(R) 266 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 541 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 300 [2010] 3 SLR 390 [2010] 3 SLR 560 [2012] 1 SLR 348 [2014] 4 SLR 877 [2016] 5 SLR 1141 [2017] 4 SLR 1369 [2018] 5 SLR 1068 [2021] 1 SLR 180 [2021] 2 SLR 140 [2022] 2 SLR 211 [2022] 3 SLR 1417 [2022] 4 SLR 467 [2023] 4 SLR 1760 [2024] 3 SLR 1642

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 141)