Hii Yii Ann & Anor v Tiong Thai King & Anor

[2024] SGHC(I) 16 Singapore International Commercial Court 7 June 2024 SIC/OA 15/2023 ( SIC/SUM 58/2023 ) 11 min read
4 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judge Thomas Bathurst
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Allen & Gledhill LLP, Trenchant Law LLC, Choy Chee Yean, Matthew Soo Yee, Nicholas Kam Xuan Wei, Ong Boon Hwee William, Su Jin Chandran, Xu Jiaxiong Daryl

Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 16, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (8)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Hii Yii Ann and another v Tiong Thai King and another and another matter [2024] SGHC(I) 16 was a reserved judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court delivered by Thomas Bathurst IJ on 7 June 2024, in Originating Application No 15 of 2023 (Summons No 58 of 2023), following a hearing on 18 March 2024. SIC/SUM 58/2023 was an application by Mr Hii Yii Ann and Alliance Lumber (PNG) Limited (the Claimants) for further and better particulars of the Defence and Counterclaim (Amendment No 1) dated 15 June 2023 of the first defendant, Mr Tiong Thai King, in SIC/OA 15/2023. The first claimant is a businessman resident in Singapore who controls companies holding timber concessions in Papua New Guinea, one of which is the second claimant; the first defendant is a businessman resident in Malaysia. The second defendant, Everrise Cooperation Pte Ltd, is a Singapore-incorporated company formed for the sole purpose of managing the operational and financial aspects of the business collaboration between the first claimant and first defendant, with the first claimant and his nominees holding 60% of its shares and the remaining 40% held by the first defendant and his nominees. The catchwords addressed civil procedure relating to pleadings and further and better particulars. The claimants were represented by Trenchant Law LLC and the defendant by Allen & Gledhill LLP.

[2024] SGHC(I) 16 explained

Hii Yii Ann & Anor v Tiong Thai King & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 16) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 7 June 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC(I) 16 about?

Hii Yii Ann & Anor v Tiong Thai King & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 16) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Further and better particulars”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

How influential is [2024] SGHC(I) 16?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC(I) 16 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What was Hii Yii Ann v Tiong Thai King [2024] SGHC(I) 16 about?

It was an application by Mr Hii Yii Ann and Alliance Lumber (PNG) Limited in the Singapore International Commercial Court for further and better particulars of the first defendant Mr Tiong Thai King's Defence and Counterclaim dated 15 June 2023. Thomas Bathurst IJ delivered judgment on 7 June 2024.

What was the shareholding in Everrise in [2024] SGHC(I) 16?

Everrise Cooperation Pte Ltd, the second defendant, was incorporated in Singapore to manage the business collaboration between the first claimant and first defendant. The first claimant and his nominees held 60% of its shares, with the remaining 40% held by the first defendant and his nominees.

Cases Cited (4)

SG (2)
[2011] SGHC 196 [2016] SGHCR 16
SLR (2)
[2004] 4 SLR(R) 200 [2013] 4 SLR 193

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(I) 16)