WHR & Anor v WHT & 13 Ors
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Succession and Wills—Codicils, Succession and Wills—Testamentary Capacity |
| Counsel | Allen & Gledhill LLP, De Souza Lim & Goh LLP, Harry Elias Partnership LLP, Selvam LLC, Tan, Oei & Oei LLC, UniLegal LLC, Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC, Alfred Li, Anna Oei Ai Hoea, Cherrilynn Chia, Christine Chuah Hui Fen, Goh Kok Yeow, Hee Theng Fong, Loh Li Qin, Loh Weijie Leonard, Philip Ling, Poon Pui Yee, Racheal Wong Shu Yi, Sarbjit Singh Chopra, Tan Teng Muan, Tan Xeauwei, William Ong |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 32, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (22)
Case Significance
WHR and another v WHT and others [2023] SGHCF 32 is a reserved judgment of Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 19 July 2023 in Suit No 4 of 2019. The plaintiffs, WHR and WHS, sued as executors of the Last Will and Testament dated 25 March 1999 and Codicil dated 6 August 2008 of LLT, deceased, against fourteen defendants; LLT was born in China on 3 March 1917, emigrated to Singapore in 1935 aged 18, built a wholesale luxury watch business, and died on 13 March 2009 aged 92 leaving a large estate and seven children. After his estate remained unadministered for about five years, the first and second defendants filed caveats against the grant of probate on 9 October 2014; the catchwords address succession and wills questions of codicils and testamentary capacity.
[2023] SGHCF 32 explained
WHR & Anor v WHT & 13 Ors ([2023] SGHCF 32) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 19 July 2023. It is categorised under Succession and Wills—Codicils and Succession and Wills—Testamentary Capacity. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHCF 32 about?
WHR & Anor v WHT & 13 Ors ([2023] SGHCF 32) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Succession and Wills—Codicils” and “Succession and Wills—Testamentary Capacity”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
How influential is [2023] SGHCF 32?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 32 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
This was a probate suit in which the executors of the estate of a deceased businessman sought to prove his Will and Codicil in solemn form against a group of family members who opposed their validity, raising issues of testamentary capacity. As no witnesses were called for the opposing defendants and no contrary evidence was adduced, Choo Han Teck J found the Will and Codicil validly executed and declared them proved in solemn form. The court ordered that each party bear its own costs.
What was WHR v WHT [2023] SGHCF 32 about?
It was a succession dispute before Choo Han Teck J in the Family Division, delivered on 19 July 2023, in which WHR and WHS sued as executors of the Will dated 25 March 1999 and Codicil dated 6 August 2008 of LLT against fourteen defendants.
Who was LLT in WHR v WHT [2023] SGHCF 32?
LLT was born in China on 3 March 1917, emigrated to Singapore in 1935 aged 18, built a wholesale luxury watch business and died on 13 March 2009 aged 92, leaving a large estate and seven children; caveats against probate were filed on 9 October 2014.
Cases Cited (1)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 32)