WLR & Anor v WLT & Anor

[2023] SGHCF 24 High Court (Family Division) 11 May 2023 HCF/OSM 2/2022 · HCF/OSM 3/2022 · HCF/OSM 4/2022 · HCF/OSM 5/2022 29 min read
Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court (Family Division)
Decided
Judge Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim Family Law
Counsel Allen & Gledhill LLP, CNPLaw LLP, TSMP Law Corporation, Adrian Tan Gim Hai, Angela Chai Rui Min, Hu Huimin, Lim Lei Theng, Ong Pei Ching, S Lingesh Kumar, See Tow Soo Ling

Source: [2023] SGHCF 24, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (10)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

WLR and another v WLT and another and other matters [2023] SGHCF 24 is a reserved judgment of Choo Han Teck J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 11 May 2023 in Originating Summonses (Mental Capacity Act) Nos 2, 3, 4 and 5 of 2022. The matters were brought under Section 20 of the Mental Capacity Act (Cap 177A) concerning P, a person alleged to lack capacity, whose spouse L she married in the early 1960s and with whom she raised four children. The present dispute is a head-on confrontation between two of the children, T and his sister J, over deputyship in relation to P.

[2023] SGHCF 24 explained

WLR & Anor v WLT & Anor ([2023] SGHCF 24) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 11 May 2023. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2023] SGHCF 24 about?

WLR & Anor v WLT & Anor ([2023] SGHCF 24) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Family Law - Deputyship”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2023] SGHCF 24 consider?

The judgment refers to Mental Capacity Act (Cap 177A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2023] SGHCF 24?

Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 24 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

These consolidated Mental Capacity Act originating summonses concerned a mother, P, who suffers from severe Alzheimer's disease, with her children disputing who should be appointed as her deputy and whether a Lasting Power of Attorney should be revoked. Finding that P had already lost mental capacity by 10 January 2019, the court set aside the LPA executed on that date as invalid. It granted the deputyship applications with amendments to the deputies appointed, and dismissed one of the four summonses.

What was WLR and another v WLT and another [2023] SGHCF 24 about?

Choo Han Teck J heard four Originating Summonses under Section 20 of the Mental Capacity Act concerning P, a person alleged to lack capacity. The deputyship dispute was a confrontation between two of P's children, T and his sister J. The judgment was delivered on 11 May 2023.

What is the deputyship issue in WLR and another v WLT and another [2023] SGHCF 24?

The proceedings, brought under Section 20 of the Mental Capacity Act (Cap 177A) in relation to P, a person alleged to lack capacity, turned on a deputyship dispute between family members, principally P's children T and J, while other children G and W were not involved or only peripherally so.

Statutes Cited

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 24)