TAHNOON PASHA v AVERE MARK HILL & Anor
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 36 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 13 February 2026 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing striking out. The judgment was delivered by Low Siew Ling. The case was brought by Tahnoon Pasha (plaintiff) against Chionh Chye Kit and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by TSMP Law Corporation and Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. The judgment cites 14 cases (11 Singapore, 3 foreign).
Summary
Tahnoon Pasha sued Avere Mark Hill and another in a dispute involving allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in a business relationship. The court addressed the claims of dishonesty and the appropriate remedies including account of profits and equitable compensation.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 36?
[2026] SGHC 36 (TAHNOON PASHA v AVERE MARK HILL & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 13 February 2026 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically striking out. The judgment was delivered by Low Siew Ling.
Who were the parties in TAHNOON PASHA v AVERE MARK HILL & Anor?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 36 was Tahnoon Pasha, and the defendant was Chionh Chye Kit, Hill, Avere Mark. Legal representation included Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and TSMP Law Corporation. The case was decided on 13 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 36?
[2026] SGHC 36 was delivered by Low Siew Ling in the High Court (General Division) on 13 February 2026. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 36 cite?
[2026] SGHC 36 cites 14 prior decisions, including 3 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (14)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 36)