DPT & Anor v DPV & Ors
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Anselmo Reyes, Roger Giles, S Mohan |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | Calvin Liang LLC, Providence Law Asia LLC, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, Sim Chong LLC, Yu Law, Asiyah binte Ahmad Arif, Avinash Vinayak Pradhan, Divyesh Menon, Ku Chern Ying Vanessa, Liang Hanwen Calvin, Poon Kin Mun Kelvin, Rajiv Hariharan, Sim Chong, Timothy James Chong Wen An, Yu Kexin, Zhuo Jiaxiang |
Source: [2025] SGHC(I) 29, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (16)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC(I) 29 is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision dated 1 December 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan, with Anselmo Reyes and Roger Giles on the coram. The case was brought by DPT and others (applicant) against DPX and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and Calvin Liang LLC. The judgment cites 24 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the Companies Act, and the International Arbitration Act.
[2025] SGHC(I) 29 explained
DPT & Anor v DPV & Ors ([2025] SGHC(I) 29) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 1 December 2025. It is categorised under Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC(I) 29 about?
DPT & Anor v DPV & Ors ([2025] SGHC(I) 29) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside” and “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Breach of natural justice”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC(I) 29 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), Companies Act (Cap 50), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC(I) 29 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 181, [2025] SGHC 61, and [2024] SGHC(I) 4. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC(I) 29?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC(I) 29 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Two applicants sought to set aside a SIAC partial award in a dispute over a fintech joint venture company, alleging inability to present their case and breach of natural justice. The SICC dismissed the application, finding the tribunal had adequately addressed all essential issues including the legitimacy of convertible loan note conversions and their effect on shareholdings, and that the applicants' complaints amounted to disagreements with the tribunal's reasoning rather than genuine due process failures.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC(I) 29?
[2025] SGHC(I) 29 (DPT & Anor v DPV & Ors) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 1 December 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan.
Who were the parties in DPT & Anor v DPV & Ors ([2025] SGHC(I) 29)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC(I) 29 was DPT, DPU, and the respondent was DPX, DPV. Legal representation included Calvin Liang LLC and Providence Law Asia LLC. The case was decided on 1 December 2025 in the Singapore International Commercial Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC(I) 29?
[2025] SGHC(I) 29 was delivered by S Mohan in the Singapore International Commercial Court on 1 December 2025. Anselmo Reyes and Roger Giles also sat on the coram. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC(I) 29 cite?
[2025] SGHC(I) 29 cites 24 prior decisions. It references Arbitration Act, Companies Act, International Arbitration Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (24)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC(I) 29)