Leading Arbitration Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

The High Court dismissed all five grounds and the application to set aside, holding that the award stands in its entirety; directions on costs were to be given separately.

The court allowed OA 1316 and set aside the award under Art 34(2)(a)(i) of the Model Law as there was no valid arbitration agreement.

The SICC dismissed the application to set aside the award.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellants to pay the respondents costs fixed at $90,000 (all-in) on the standard basis.

The court ordered the claimant to pay the defendant's costs of SUM 1193 in the total sum of $37,840.75, made up of $7,000 for work before the transfer, $28,000 for work after the transfer and…

The court dismissed all three applications in their entirety with costs, to be agreed or fixed on written submissions, leaving the Quantum Award and Final Award in place.

The High Court dismissed BREB's application to set aside the award in its entirety, with costs to be agreed or decided on written submissions.

The High Court dismissed the application, finding no breach of the fair hearing rule and, in any event, no showing that any alleged breach could reasonably have made a difference to the award.

The court dismissed the application on every ground and ordered the claimants to pay DSU's costs on the indemnity basis, fixed at $65,000 including disbursements.

The court dismissed the application.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Russia's appeal with costs, holding that the Dutch appellate decisions establish that Russia agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration within s 11 of the Act and that…

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…

The court dismissed SUM 62 and dismissed prayers 1 and 2 of SUM 286, for the reasons given in the 25 July Decision.

The court dismissed Russia's claim to immunity, holding that it was precluded by issue estoppels arising from the Dutch appellate decisions from denying that it had agreed in writing to arbitrate, so…

The court allowed DKC's application and ordered that all further proceedings be stayed under s 6 of the Act, on condition that DKC commence a Stockholm expedited arbitration within 10 days seeking…

The Singapore International Commercial Court allowed the application and granted the interim anti-suit injunction, restraining MB until the final determination of OA 18 from pursuing the Nepalese…

The court allowed TrueCoin's application and granted the anti-suit injunction, permanently restraining Techteryx from continuing to pursue the Hong Kong action against TrueCoin, with liberty to apply.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA) allowed the appeal.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part.

The court dismissed OA 642 and discharged the interim order.

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…

The court dismissed Erdenet's application to set aside the order granting permission to enforce the award, and upheld that order.

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, refused permission to appeal and dismissed the application, declined to order a case management stay, and left open the…

The court dismissed both OA 26 and OA 27, holding DMF a party to the charterparty and bound by the arbitration clause, and leaving illegality and public policy to the tribunal.

The SICC allowed the application, holding that GGK was entitled to an anti-suit injunction restraining Asiana from continuing the Korean proceedings on the catering agreement, and that GGS was…

The court dismissed both OA 26 and OA 27, holding DMF a party to the charterparty and bound by the arbitration clause, and leaving illegality and public policy to the tribunal.

The court allowed the application and set aside the specified paragraphs of the Jurisdictional Ruling.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Robert French IJ) dismissed the appeal at the close of oral argument and later gave its reasons.

Chua Lee Ming J dismissed DFM's application to set aside the enforcement order, holding that although the DIAC arbitration did not accord with the parties' agreement, DFM had submitted to the…

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered by Steven Chong JCA, dismissed all three appeals.

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, refused permission to appeal and dismissed the application, declined to order a case management stay, and left open the…

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part.

The court dismissed Phoenix's application to set aside the enforcement order and granted PIMD the relief sought in OA 1, with slight changes to the wording and an express statement that nothing in…

The SICC allowed the application, holding that GGK was entitled to an anti-suit injunction restraining Asiana from continuing the Korean proceedings on the catering agreement, and that GGS was…

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and maintained the anti-suit injunction in the terms ordered by the Judge, awarding Westbridge costs of $100,000 all in.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Russia's appeal with costs, holding that the Dutch appellate decisions establish that Russia agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration within s 11 of the Act and that…

The court dismissed Russia's claim to immunity, holding that it was precluded by issue estoppels arising from the Dutch appellate decisions from denying that it had agreed in writing to arbitrate, so…

Wong Li Kok, Alex JC dismissed the setting-aside application and ordered costs of S$33,000 to the respondents.

The Court of Appeal dismissed India's appeal.

The SICC granted the respondents' stay applications under s 6 of the International Arbitration Act 1994 and ordered that both judicial management applications be stayed, with all disputes on the…

Assistant Registrar Wong Hee Jinn allowed DJA's application and stayed all proceedings in OA 1109 pending the final determination of the arbitration, with costs in the cause.

Lee Seiu Kin SJ dismissed the appeal.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…

The court granted leave to the applicant to file the executed further affidavit on or before 14 April 2025, reserving to the respondent all rights to argue at the hearing that it was inadmissible,…

The Court of Appeal dismissed India's appeal.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Robert French IJ) dismissed the appeal at the hearing on 31 July 2024 and ordered RINFRA to pay SEC costs of USD160,000, giving its…

The court dismissed Reliance Infrastructure's application to set aside the award and awarded costs to Shanghai Electric, with the amount to be agreed or decided on short written submissions.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered that JHC be wound up.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellants to pay the respondents costs fixed at $90,000 (all-in) on the standard basis.

The Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed the application to set aside the partial award in its entirety, finding no breach of natural justice on either ground.

The High Court dismissed both OA 198 and SUM 1653, finding no breach of natural justice under s 24(b) of the International Arbitration Act 1994 and no inability to present the case under Art…

The High Court (Andre Maniam J) dismissed JXC's setting-aside application, including its challenge to the costs decision.

The court dismissed the Employer's application to set aside the Final Award dated 2 April 2025 and the Decision and Addendum dated 25 June 2025.

Vinodh Coomaraswamy J dismissed all three applications to set aside the award, with costs.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the winding-up order and dismissed CWU 120.

The court dismissed the winding up application.

Vinodh Coomaraswamy J dismissed the winding up application, holding that the claimant had not established standing as a creditor, and ordered it to pay the defendant costs fixed at $25,000 including…

The High Court dismissed the application to set aside the award under s 24(b) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and held that the alternative request for remission did not arise.

A single judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed the application for leave to adduce both sets of solicitors' notes and fixed costs at $12,000 (all-in), payable by Vietnam Oil and Gas to the…

The court refused to set aside the award on damages under cl 19.6(a).

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, refused permission to appeal and dismissed the application, declined to order a case management stay, and left open the…

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, leaving the stay in favour of arbitration and the case management stay in place.

Hri Kumar Nair J allowed the judicial management application, dismissed Delta's registrar's appeal and its IRDA summons with costs to be paid by Delta to Gulf International, and made no order on the…

The Assistant Registrar allowed the application and ordered that ADM 83 be stayed in favour of arbitration under s 6 of the IAA, with liberty to apply.

Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed the appeal.

S Mohan J dismissed the appeal and upheld the stay.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Robert French IJ) dismissed the appeal at the hearing on 31 July 2024 and ordered RINFRA to pay SEC costs of USD160,000, giving its…

The court dismissed Reliance Infrastructure's application to set aside the award and awarded costs to Shanghai Electric, with the amount to be agreed or decided on short written submissions.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and James Allsop IJ) dismissed the appeal.

The court dismissed LHNV's application to set aside the order granting GOL permission to enforce the ICSID award.

The High Court dismissed the application to set aside the final award and ordered the applicant to pay the respondents costs fixed at $25,000 plus disbursements.

Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed the appeal.

Lee Seiu Kin SJ dismissed the appeal.

Assistant Registrar Perry Peh dismissed the stay application and ordered CMT to pay MTPL costs of $12,000 plus disbursements of $500.

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…

Chua Lee Ming J dismissed DFM's application to set aside the enforcement order, holding that although the DIAC arbitration did not accord with the parties' agreement, DFM had submitted to the…

The court dismissed all three applications in their entirety with costs, to be agreed or fixed on written submissions, leaving the Quantum Award and Final Award in place.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the award.

Sushil Nair J dismissed the application on 3 March 2026 and later gave full grounds.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and maintained the anti-suit injunction in the terms ordered by the Judge, awarding Westbridge costs of $100,000 all in.

The court dismissed the Employer's application to set aside the Final Award dated 2 April 2025 and the Decision and Addendum dated 25 June 2025.

The Singapore International Commercial Court allowed the application in part.

The Assistant Registrar allowed the application and ordered that ADM 83 be stayed in favour of arbitration under s 6 of the IAA, with liberty to apply.

The High Court allowed the appeal and ordered that OA 189 be stayed under s 6 of the IAA, and ordered DAY to pay DAZ's costs fixed at $10,391 for SUM 860 and $10,750.80 for the appeal, inclusive of…

The Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed both of the Rajawalis' applications, holding that none of the grounds for setting aside the award or the Enforcement Order had been made out.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the summons in limine as an abuse of process, and, for completeness, held that it would also have failed on the merits because the further evidence was not even…

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA) dismissed the application on 30 August 2024, and the request to amend it fell away.

The Chief Justice dismissed the application on 25 April 2023, reserved the costs of the application until after the hearing of the appeal, and ordered that India's security for costs remain in place…

The court dismissed Phoenix's application to set aside the enforcement order and granted PIMD the relief sought in OA 1, with slight changes to the wording and an express statement that nothing in…

The court dismissed SUM 8 in respect of prayers 1(b) to 1(d), made no order on the declaration about service, and ordered that ORC 5 stand, with Phoenix to pay PIMD's costs.

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…

The High Court allowed Moveon's application, refused enforcement of the interim award under s 31(2)(d) of the International Arbitration Act 1994, and set aside the enforcement order, holding that the…